MHB From quadratic form to vertex form

AI Thread Summary
To convert the quadratic expression $-x^2 + 4x - 1$ into vertex form, the completing the square method is suggested. The negative sign in front of the $x^2$ term complicates the process, and factoring it out simplifies the equation. By rewriting the expression as $-(x^2 - 4x + 1)$, the vertex form can be derived. The final result is $y = -(x - 2)^2 + 3$, indicating the vertex at (2, 3). This method effectively clarifies the transformation into vertex form.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
$-x^2+4x-1$ should be converted to the vertex form of $y=k-(x-h)^2$

How can this be solved by factoring or any other method ?

My attempt to solve this problem , I will be using the completing the square method,

$\left(-x^2+4x+\frac{-b}{2a}\right)=1+\frac{-b}{2a}$

Here $\frac{-4}{-2}=2$

$\left(-x^2+4x+2\right)=1+2$

$\left(-x+2\right)^2=1+2$

$\left(-x+2\right)^2+3$

It's incorrect

Many Thanks (Happy)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
$-x^2+4x-1$ should be converted to the vertex form of $y=k-(x-h)^2$

How can this be solved by factoring or any other method ?

My attempt to solve this problem , I will be using the completing the square method,

$\left(-x^2+4x+\frac{-b}{2a}\right)=1+\frac{-b}{2a}$

Here $\frac{-4}{-2}=2$

$\left(-x^2+4x+2\right)=1+2$

$\left(-x+2\right)^2=1+2$

$\left(-x+2\right)^2+3$

It's incorrect

Many Thanks (Happy)
It's the negative in front of the x^2 term that's causing you problems. I'd factor it out at the beginning:
[math]y = -x^2 + 4x - 1 = -(x^2 - 4x + 1) = \text{ ... }[/math]

I get [math]y = -(x - 2)^2 + 3[/math].

-Dan
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top