FRW Metric in d Dimensions: Can I Expand?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the expansion of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric in a higher-dimensional context, specifically considering the implications of adding extra spatial dimensions and the role of the scale factor in these dimensions. The scope includes theoretical exploration of cosmological models in different dimensional frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the FRW metric can be expanded in d spatial dimensions and whether the scale factor should be applied to all spatial terms.
  • Another participant suggests that the scale factor must be present in all spatial terms to maintain isotropy, indicating that failing to do so would break isotropy.
  • A third participant agrees with the necessity of the scale factor for isotropy and proposes that generalizing the FRW metric in spherical coordinates involves replacing the angular part with the metric for the appropriate unit sphere, assuming isotropy in the extra dimensions.
  • A later reply references a paper that discusses adding a fifth dimension to the FRW model, proposing an alternative term for the scale factor in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of the scale factor for maintaining isotropy in the expanded metric, but there is no consensus on the specific formulation or implications of the expansion in higher dimensions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about isotropy in higher dimensions and the mathematical formulation of the FRW metric, which may depend on specific definitions and contexts not fully resolved in the conversation.

ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I was wondering if I can expand the FRW metric in d spatial dimensions, like:g_{\mu \nu}^{frw} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & - \frac{a^2(t)}{1-kr^2} & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & - a^2(t) r^2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -a^2 (t) r^2 \sin^2 \theta \end{pmatrix} \rightarrow g_{MN} = \begin{pmatrix} g_{\mu \nu}^{frw} & 0 \\ 0 & - 1_{(d-3) \times (d-3)} \end{pmatrix}

Or should I insert a ##-a^2 (t) ## for the rest too?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't seen the FRW metric discussed for a different number of dimensions, but I would think the scale factor would have to be present in all the spatial terms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChrisVer
PeterDonis said:
I haven't seen the FRW metric discussed for a different number of dimensions, but I would think the scale factor would have to be present in all the spatial terms.
Agreed. You would break isotropy otherwise unless I am not thinking straight... For isotropy to hold, the FRW metric in spherica coordinates should be pretty straight forward to generalise - just replace ##d\Omega^2## by the metric for the appropriate unit sphere.

This of course relies on the assumption tha you want to be isotropic also in the extra dimensions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChrisVer
I think you are right. I found a paper
"Higher Dimensional FRW String Cosmological Models in a New Scalar-tensor Theory of Gravitation" where they added a fifth dimension in FRW with a term A^2(t) d \mu instead of R^2(t) to the original 3 spatial dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K