Function Composition: Graphing f(g(x)) Without Equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the process of graphing the composition of two functions, f(g(x)), using only their graphical representations without explicit equations. Participants clarify that to graph f(g(x)), one must first identify the output of g(x) for a given x, denoted as A, and then use this value to find the corresponding output of f(A). The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately reading values from the graphs of f(x) and g(x) to construct the new graph of f(g(x)). It is noted that if the functions are simple, one might derive equations to facilitate the graphing process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of function composition
  • Ability to read and interpret graphical data
  • Familiarity with basic graphing techniques
  • Knowledge of how to identify function outputs from graphs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for graphing function compositions without equations
  • Learn techniques for extracting values from graphs
  • Explore examples of function composition with simple functions like linear and quadratic
  • Study graphical transformations and their implications on function composition
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mathematics, educators teaching function composition, and anyone interested in graphical analysis of functions.

SD-Ness
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I've been an intermittent poster here for about five years. I've come back for another shot at PF. So for a first thread:

Class is a currently a review of old topics. One of them is 'function composition.' I was doing an assignment today and came upon a question that required one to graph f(g(x)) from two graphs given f(x) and g(x). There were no equations supplied. How might one go about graphing f(g(x))? I am not sure of the relationship here, unfortunately.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SD-Ness said:
Class is a currently a review of old topics. One of them is 'function composition.' I was doing an assignment today and came upon a question that required one to graph f(g(x)) from two graphs given f(x) and g(x). There were no equations supplied. How might one go about graphing f(g(x))? I am not sure of the relationship here, unfortunately.

It sounds like you have two graphs, and have to generate a third one, f(g(x)) from the graphs of f(x) and g(x)?

Well, right now, you have y=g(x) and y=f(x). But you want a graph which is y=f(g(x)). Is this enough to get you started? This sounds like a pain, BTW.

Dot
 
Dorothy Weglend said:
It sounds like you have two graphs, and have to generate a third one, f(g(x)) from the graphs of f(x) and g(x)?

Well, right now, you have y=g(x) and y=f(x). But you want a graph which is y=f(g(x)). Is this enough to get you started? This sounds like a pain, BTW.

Dot
Yes, this is correct. I have two graphs - f(x) and g(x) - and I need to generate the third, f(g(x)).

I know that y=g(x) and y=f(x), but I'm not sure how to generate y=f(g(x)) from that.
 
let x=g(x), to sub into the equation y = f(x)? don't know if its an help. its a strange question.
 
Last edited:
SD-Ness said:
Yes, this is correct. I have two graphs - f(x) and g(x) - and I need to generate the third, f(g(x)).

I know that y=g(x) and y=f(x), but I'm not sure how to generate y=f(g(x)) from that.

The only difference is that you have to look up the values on the graphs, instead of compute them. A = g(x), y = f(A), this is how you would compute a function composition, right? These X's and Y's would be the coord's of the point on the new graph. The intermediate value of A is just used to look up the proper value of the function composition.

I'm assuming here that the graphs are complicated, and it's not possible to recover the functions that generated them. If they are simple, like a straight line or a parabola, then you could recover the functions (or make a good guess) and generate a formula to plot the new graph directly.

Dot

Dot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K