Function for the velocity of a bouncing ball

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the mathematical modeling of the time taken for a bouncing rubber ball to return to the ground after being dropped from various heights. Participants explore the relationship between height, time, and the nature of the function that describes this relationship, which appears to be quadratic.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the function relating height and time is quadratic but seek mathematical justification for this observation.
  • There is a question regarding the definition of "time taken for it to bounce," with clarifications about whether it refers to the time until the ball hits the ground or includes multiple bounces.
  • One participant explains that under constant acceleration, the displacement can be expressed as a function of time, leading to a quadratic relationship.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of energy loss during bounces, suggesting that the coefficient of restitution affects the height reached after each bounce and thus influences the total time taken.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of the coefficient of restitution, particularly regarding its implications for height after a bounce.
  • A suggestion is made that to achieve a linear relationship between time and displacement, one would need to assume constant velocity, implying zero acceleration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the coefficient of restitution and the nature of the function describing the relationship between height and time. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing interpretations present.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the mathematical relationships discussed, particularly regarding the coefficient of restitution and its effect on height and time. There are also unresolved assumptions about the conditions under which the quadratic relationship holds.

Jeven
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I graphed different heights from which I had dropped a bouncing rubber ball on the y-axis and the time taken for it to bounce on the x-axis. The function came out to be quadratic, but I do not know why. If someone can show mathematically why this is, that'd be splendid. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jeven said:
I graphed different heights from which I had dropped a bouncing rubber ball on the y-axis and the time taken for it to bounce on the x-axis. The function came out to be quadratic, but I do not know why. If someone can show mathematically why this is, that'd be splendid. Thank you.
What do you exactly mean by the time taken for it to bounce? Is it the time taken for it to reach to the ground or to reach the ground and bounce a few times and stop due to loss of energy?
 
Jeven said:
I graphed different heights from which I had dropped a bouncing rubber ball on the y-axis and the time taken for it to bounce on the x-axis. The function came out to be quadratic, but I do not know why. If someone can show mathematically why this is, that'd be splendid. Thank you.
It is motion with constant acceleration. How is the displacement related to time?
 
Guneykan Ozgul said:
What do you exactly mean by the time taken for it to bounce? Is it the time taken for it to reach to the ground or to reach the ground and bounce a few times and stop due to loss of energy?
I am sorry I forgot to add that the time is the time taken for it to bounce 5 times.
 
Jeven said:
I am sorry I forgot to add that the time is the time taken for it to bounce 5 times.
Okay. Now, let's say that acceleration is constant a . Now the velocity at time t will be at. Then the displacement d=∫atdt=1/2at^2 assuming that the initial position is 0.
Now let's say that the ball hits the ground and the energy of the ball reduces to bE where E is the energy of the ball before it hits the ground and b is a some arbitrary constant. Now the particle will go to 1/b of initial height then the time will be √(1/b) of the time it takes to hit the ground. So if you do this 5 times you will find the total time. If b is 1, that is ball does not lose energy when it hits the ground you will get directly get only quadratic term since d is proportional to square of t. If b is bigger than 1, still the leading term will be square of t. So it is a quadratic.
Hope this is helpful.
 
Guneykan Ozgul said:
Okay. Now, let's say that acceleration is constant a . Now the velocity at time t will be at. Then the displacement d=∫atdt=1/2at^2 assuming that the initial position is 0.
Now let's say that the ball hits the ground and the energy of the ball reduces to bE where E is the energy of the ball before it hits the ground and b is a some arbitrary constant. Now the particle will go to 1/b of initial height then the time will be √(1/b) of the time it takes to hit the ground. So if you do this 5 times you will find the total time. If b is 1, that is ball does not lose energy when it hits the ground you will get directly get only quadratic term since d is proportional to square of t. If b is bigger than 1, still the leading term will be square of t. So it is a quadratic.
Hope this is helpful.
Yes it is thank you. But I don't quite understand the (1/b) part, why would that be the energy? And what would I do to make this function a linear function? Because I need to graph a straight line.
 
Guneykan Ozgul said:
Okay. Now, let's say that acceleration is constant a . Now the velocity at time t will be at. Then the displacement d=∫atdt=1/2at^2 assuming that the initial position is 0.
Now let's say that the ball hits the ground and the energy of the ball reduces to bE where E is the energy of the ball before it hits the ground and b is a some arbitrary constant. Now the particle will go to 1/b of initial height then the time will be √(1/b) of the time it takes to hit the ground. So if you do this 5 times you will find the total time. If b is 1, that is ball does not lose energy when it hits the ground you will get directly get only quadratic term since d is proportional to square of t. If b is bigger than 1, still the leading term will be square of t. So it is a quadratic.
Hope this is helpful.

if b is the coefficient of restitution, COR, which is less than 1,then why would it go to 1/b of the initial height, meaning it would surpass the initial height since 1/COR>1 ?? I see you know your stuff so I must be at a loss here so could you please explain your meaning :)
 
Belovedcritic said:
if b is the coefficient of restitution, COR, which is less than 1,then why would it go to 1/b of the initial height, meaning it would surpass the initial height since 1/COR>1 ?? I see you know your stuff so I must be at a loss here so could you please explain your meaning :)

He just made some little confusion I guess.
If the energy of the ball at the initial peak h_0 is E_0 = mgh_0, after the bounce you'll have, again at the peak, E_1 = bE_0 = mgbh_0, so h_1=bh_0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K