Ball bounces back to same height after Angular Impulse?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a ball that bounces off a frictional surface after falling from a height. Participants explore the implications of angular impulse and the potential for the ball to rebound to a height greater than its original drop height, considering factors such as rigidity, spin, and energy transfer mechanisms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that after a ball collides with a frictional surface, its x-component of velocity is reduced while the y-velocity is reflected upwards, assuming the ball is rigid and does not deform.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial claim, affirming its correctness.
  • A different participant introduces the idea that the ball could potentially rebound higher than its original drop height if it has the right initial spin, raising questions about the conditions under which this might occur.
  • Further exploration includes the possibility that if the ball is not perfectly rigid and behaves like a spring, it could compress during the collision, allowing for energy transfer that might enable a higher rebound.
  • One participant proposes a hypothetical mechanism involving a pulley and hammer system that could convert the ball's lost rotational energy into vertical energy, potentially allowing the ball to achieve a height greater than its original drop height.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the ball can rebound higher than its original drop height, with some suggesting it is possible under certain conditions while others remain uncertain about the implications of rigidity and energy transfer.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the rigidity of the ball and the nature of the collision, which may affect the outcomes. The exploration of energy transfer mechanisms remains speculative and is not resolved.

FallenApple
Messages
564
Reaction score
61
So Imagine a ball moving off a frictionless cliff with a velocity v to the right, at the bottom of the cliff the surface has friction.

So after the collision, the x component of the velocity would be reduced, and the angular momentum would be fixed clockwise because the frictional impulse acted to the left.

Now clearly the bounce would not be symmetric. But I'm thinking only in the x. The maximum height of the rebound should still be the same, its only the x velocity that was reduced and convered to rotational motion. The y velcocity gets completely reflected back upwards.

This is assuming that the ball is rigid enough that it doesn't deform at all during the collision. It just get torqued up.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FallenApple said:
Is this correct?
yup
 
It gets interesting when you ask, if the ball can rebound higher than the drop, given the right initial spin.
 
A.T. said:
It gets interesting when you ask, if the ball can rebound higher than the drop, given the right initial spin.

Interesting. I suppose this is possible. I don't know if it can happen if the ball is perfectly rigid since friction horizontal only, the ball's y velocity would still be perfectly reflected regardless of original spin.

Unless the ball wasn't perfectly rigid and is spring like in constitution. So during the collision the ball would be compressed and somehow the loss of spin would further contribute to the vertical compression, of which finally, the compression is released and the ball flies up higher than it started.

I can think of one way to convert the original spin to a higher height though. If the ball has a original spin clockwise and during the collision, the ball torques down on a rope connected to pulley that has the other side of the rope in a tunnel under the floor connected to a vertically hanging hammer( also under the floor. The ball's spin would slow down, the rope would be pulled by Newton's third law, and that rotational energy lost by the ball would be transmitted to rotating the hammer like pendulum, and finally hitting the ball upwards.

If the hammer hits the ball the instant after the floor itself has completed it's impulse( assume that either the floor opens right after or that the hammer is strong enough to break through the floor), the ball would receive another impulse(without any pause following the first one) and therefore reach a final higher height.

The horizontal energy and rotational energy lost by the ball was converted to vertical energy via the pulley hammer contraption.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
1K