I can't convince myself whether the following functional derivative is trivial or not:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

##\frac \delta {\delta \psi(x)} \big[ \partial_x \psi(x)\big],##

where ##\partial_x## is a standard derivative with respect to ##x##.

One could argue that

## \partial_x \psi(x) = \int dx' [\partial_{x'} \psi(x')] \delta (x - x') = - \int dx' \psi(x') \partial_{x'} \delta (x - x'),##

assuming there is no boundary term in integration by parts.

In this case, the functional derivative would give

##\frac \delta {\delta \psi(x)}\Big[ - \int dx' \psi(x') \partial_{x'} \delta (x - x') \Big] = - \partial_{x'} \delta (x - x')\Big|_{x'=x} = 0.##

Any thoughts? Is this rigorous?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Functional derivative of normal function

Loading...

Similar Threads - Functional derivative normal | Date |
---|---|

I Why does this concavity function not work for this polar fun | Jan 26, 2018 |

B Rule to integrate a function with respect to its derivative | Sep 10, 2017 |

I Must functions really have interval domains for derivatives? | Jul 26, 2017 |

B Is the derivative of a function everywhere the same on a given curve? | Mar 26, 2017 |

Deriving functions relating to condition numbers | Mar 23, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**