Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Functional Quantization of Scalar Fields

  1. Oct 16, 2009 #1
    Hi everyone,

    I'm reading section 9.2 of Peskin and Schroeder, and have trouble understanding the origin of a term in the transition from equation 9.26 to 9.27. Specifically, equation 9.26 is

    [tex]\frac{1}{V^2}\sum_{m,l}e^{-(k_m\cdot x_1 + k_l\cdot x_2)}\left(\prod_{k_{n}^{0}>0}\int d \Re \phi_{n}d \Im \phi_{n}\right)\times (\Re \phi_m + i\Im \phi_m)(\Re \phi_n + i\Im \phi_n)\times\exp{\left[-\frac{i}{V}\sum_{k_{n}^{0}>0}(m^2-k_{n}^2)\left[(\Re \phi_n)^2 + (\Im \phi_n)^2\right]\right]}[/tex]

    This splits into two cases:

    Case 1: [itex]k_l = k_m[/itex], when the integral is zero.
    Case 2: [itex]k_l = -k_m[/itex], when the integral is nonzero.

    So, evaluating the Gaussian integral one gets

    [tex]\mbox{Numerator} = \frac{1}{V^2}\sum_{m,l}e^{-(k_m\cdot x_1 + k_l\cdot x_2)}\left(\prod_{k_{n}^{0}>0}\frac{-i\pi V}{m^2 - k_{n}^2}\right)\frac{-iV}{m^2-k_{m}^2-i\epsilon}[/tex]

    Where does the factor


    come from? I know this is like [itex]\int x^2 e^{-x^2}dx[/itex], but I can't seem to get this factor.)
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 18, 2009 #2
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Functional Quantization of Scalar Fields
  1. Quantizing fields (Replies: 9)

  2. Field quantization (Replies: 1)