MHB Functions and Relations: Proving R is a Function from A to B

Sharon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Let R\subseteq A*B be a binary relation from A to B , show that R is a function if and only if R^-1(not) R \subseteq idB and Rnot aR^-1 \supseteq both hold. Remember that Ida(idB) denotes the identity relation/ Function {(a.a)|a€ A} over A ( respectively ,B)
Please see the attachment ,I couldn't write the question properly, and this is only one question but I need help with another one too.
 

Attachments

  • received_307247869875543__01.png
    received_307247869875543__01.png
    36.4 KB · Views: 100
Physics news on Phys.org
$\text{id}_A\subseteq R\circ R^{-1}$ means that for every $a\in A$ we have $(a,a)\in R\circ R^{-1}$. By the definition of composition of relation, there exists a $b\in B$ such that $(a,b)\in R$ and $(b,a)\in R^{-1}$. In fact, $(a,b)\in R$ implies $(b,a)\in R^{-1}$, so $(b,a)\in R^{-1}$ does not add useful information, but we have shown that for every $a\in A$ there exists a $b\in B$ such that $(a,b)\in R$.

Suppose now that $(a,b)\in R$ and $(a,b')\in R$ for some $a\in A$ and $b,b'\in B$. Then $(b,a)\in R^{-1}$, so $(b,b')\in R^{-1}\circ R$. But since $R^{-1}\circ R\subseteq\text{id}_B$, it follows that $b=b'$.

It is left to prove the other direction, where the fact that $R$ is a function implies the two inclusions.

Concerning problem 7, could you write what you have done and what is not clear to you? Also, please read the https://mathhelpboards.com/rules/, especially rule #11 for the future.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top