Functions and their Extrema: Understanding Absolute Maxima and Minima

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter nDever
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extrema Functions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of absolute maxima and minima in the context of functions, particularly focusing on the conditions under which these extrema occur. Participants explore various functions and their behaviors, debating local versus global extrema and the implications of different mathematical expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially questions whether an absolute extremum can occur for functions defined on open intervals, later realizing that certain functions, like f(x) = x², do not have an absolute maximum as they increase indefinitely.
  • Another participant raises the question of whether the function e^{-x²} + x² has an absolute maximum at x=0, prompting further discussion on whether this point could be a minimum instead.
  • There is a suggestion that the function 2e^{-x²} + \frac{1}{2}x² may have absolute minima at points around x=1 and x=-1, with no absolute maximum existing.
  • Participants discuss the nature of local versus global extrema, with one noting that while there can be local maxima, they may not be global, and that the uniqueness of global minima is a relevant consideration.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the terminology of local and global extrema, with one participant expressing that all extrema are local, but not all local extrema are global.
  • There is an acknowledgment of the importance of understanding mathematical language and the use of LaTeX for expressing mathematical ideas clearly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and nature of absolute extrema for various functions. There is no consensus on the specific conditions under which these extrema occur, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of local versus global extrema.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific definitions of extrema and the nature of the functions discussed, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion also involves assumptions about the behavior of functions over specified intervals.

nDever
Messages
76
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,

I have learned that for a function f defined on an open interval I(a, b), an absolute extremum may not occur. Is this because the domain may take on every value greater than a or less than b without ever equaling a or b?

[EDIT]

Disregard the question above. I just realized. For a function such as f(x) = x2, there is no absolute maximum because as x increases, f(x) increases indefinitely.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your ideas:
Does [tex]e^{-x^2}+x^2[/tex] ... have an absolute maximum at x=0?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Check your ideas:
Does [tex]e^{-x^2}+x^2[/tex] ... have an absolute maximum at x=0?

Wouldn't that be a minimum?
 
how do you figure?
 
Simon Bridge said:
how do you figure?

At 0, y=1 and for all other x less than or greater than zero, y is equal to or greater than 1. Correct?
 
It's pretty flat about x=0 isn't it? ... how about:
[tex]2e^{-x^2} + \frac{1}{2}x^2[/tex]
 
Simon Bridge said:
It's pretty flat about x=0 isn't it? ... how about:
[tex]2e^{-x^2} + \frac{1}{2}x^2[/tex]

For this, wouldn't the absolute minima be at the troughs around x= 1 and x= -1 and the absolute maximum doesn't exist?
 
There is a local maximum at x=0, but it ain't global.

If there is one "absolute" or global minima, then it is "unique"... here there is no unique global minimum. Well done.

Technically they are at: [itex]x = \pm \sqrt{-\ln{(1/4)}} \approx \pm 1.1773[/itex] but I'm not really looking for exact here, just understanding.

There is no new math here, it's just a matter of getting used to the common language.
 
How did you post the mathematics in the format that you did? Tags?
 
  • #10
If you quote my message you'll see the tags.

The bb code is [tex](pronounced tech - as in technology) - to put equations inline like I did use [itex]. Everything written inside those tags is LaTeX (lay-tech).<br /> This is an academic standard way to mark-up documents for publication: <i>really</i> worth learning. The forum server has an engine which can turn LaTeX markup into a graphic... It makes writing out math very very simple and clear.<br /> <br /> There are loads of tutorials etc around the web, and you can get a "Latex" program for any platform for you to use at home.<br /> The only problem is, when you tell someone "I am really into latex." they look at you funny.[/itex][/tex]
 
  • #11
OK, so then allow me to do another example.

for [tex]2e^{-x^2} + \frac{1}{2}x[/tex],

there wouldn't be any global extrema. Zero would be a local maximum, and the the local minimum would depend on the open interval. Is this correct?
 
  • #12
Extrema are all local to themselves, so it is a fair characterization without specifying the region. I checked and it turns out that you can have more than one global extrema ... which is why the term "unique" gets applied when there is only one.

In [itex]f(x)=x(x-1)(x+1)[/itex] there are two extrema, neither are global.

The fun thing is that the function can be anything ... eg. does the dirac delta function have any extrema?
 
  • #13
Simon Bridge said:
Extrema are all local to themselves

So you mean that all extrema are local, but not all local extrema are global?
 
  • #14
That would be right.

I use local and global for relative and absolute - I don't think it matters.
But it is useful to play around and explore to deepen your understanding.
It's usually more important to be able to express words in math than math in words though.

So now you can use the language, and you learned to use LaTeX.
That should be enough for now :)
 
  • #15
Simon Bridge said:
But it is useful to play around and explore to deepen your understanding.
It's usually more important to be able to express words in math than math in words though.

I agree. I am better at understanding the concept and creating abstractions in my mind than I am at mathematical terminology.

Thank you for all of your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K