sammycaps
- 89
- 0
So I'm revamping the question I had posted here, after a bit of work.
I'm concerned with the homomorphism induced by the inclusion of the Figure 8 into the Torus, and why it is surjective. There seem to be a lot of semi-explanations, but I just wanted to see if the one I thought of makes sense.
So, we know that the fundamental group of the Figure 8 is isomorphic to the free product on 2 generators (i.e. of two copies of the integers), and the fundamental group on the torus is isomorphic to the cartesian product of two copies of the integers.
So, I don't know if there is a homomorphism j* such that this diagram commutes, for f and g isomorphisms from above, but if there is then this diagram commutes,
\pi1(Figure 8) \stackrel{i*}{\longrightarrow} \pi1(Torus)
\:\:\:\:\:\:\:f\downarrow\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:g\downarrow
\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:Z*Z\:\:\:\:\stackrel{j*}{\longrightarrow} \:Z×Z
And then we can do something from there.
Is that going somewhere, or not at all?
I'm concerned with the homomorphism induced by the inclusion of the Figure 8 into the Torus, and why it is surjective. There seem to be a lot of semi-explanations, but I just wanted to see if the one I thought of makes sense.
So, we know that the fundamental group of the Figure 8 is isomorphic to the free product on 2 generators (i.e. of two copies of the integers), and the fundamental group on the torus is isomorphic to the cartesian product of two copies of the integers.
So, I don't know if there is a homomorphism j* such that this diagram commutes, for f and g isomorphisms from above, but if there is then this diagram commutes,
\pi1(Figure 8) \stackrel{i*}{\longrightarrow} \pi1(Torus)
\:\:\:\:\:\:\:f\downarrow\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:g\downarrow
\:\:\:\:\:\:\:\:Z*Z\:\:\:\:\stackrel{j*}{\longrightarrow} \:Z×Z
And then we can do something from there.
Is that going somewhere, or not at all?
Last edited: