Fundamental laws time reversal

  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

It is often told that fundamental laws are insensitive to +t/-t change. Let's try this one: a little mass m1 object is accelerating towards a big object M2, in -x direction in space and +t in time, due to gravity or following space-time free fall line (along a geodetic). Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural. Am I not speaking of some fundamental law?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
jbriggs444
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
2019 Award
8,776
3,534
It is often told that fundamental laws are insensitive to +t/-t change. Let's try this one: a little mass m1 object is accelerating towards a big object M2, in -x direction in space and +t in time, due to gravity or following space-time free fall line (along a geodetic). Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural. Am I not speaking of some fundamental law?
A small object flying away from a big object and decelerating as it goes is natural and in complete accordance with the laws of classical mechanics. Any object launched with a velocity greater than or equal to escape velocity will follow such a free-fall geodesic trajectory. [If the incoming object fails to intersect with the surface of the big object, it will continue on just such an outbound path]

Edit: trajectories with less than escape velocity are reversible as well.
 
  • Like
Likes Alfredo Tifi
  • #3
29,596
5,898
Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural.
Why do you say it is unnatural?

In the simplest case we have ##x(t)=0.5 g t^2+v_0 t+ x_0##. What do you get when you make the transformation ##t \rightarrow -T##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Alfredo Tifi
  • #4
... Any object launched with a velocity less than or equal to escape velocity will follow such a free-fall geodesic trajectory...
Thank you Jbriggs to help me recognizing a misconcept of mine :-)
 
  • #5
Why do you say it is unnatural?

In the simplest case we have ##x(t)=0.5 g t^2+v_0 t+ x_0##. What do you get when you make the transformation ##t \rightarrow -T##
Sorry Dale. I just mistaken a spatial mirrored motion for a time inversion (repulsion instead of attraction).
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #7
It is often told that fundamental laws are insensitive to +t/-t change. Let's try this one: a little mass m1 object is accelerating towards a big object M2, in -x direction in space and +t in time, due to gravity or following space-time free fall line (along a geodetic). Now, revert the video and look at the -t history. What happens is absolutely innatural. Am I not speaking of some fundamental law?
To see the effects of time reversal in classical mechanics you just have to change the sign of all velocities -- that is, reverse their direction. In a gravity field the original, un-reversed falling object would be speeding up, falling faster and faster. Imagine you reverse the velocity. Now the object is moving upward, presumably because someone on the ground threw it up into the air. The object retraces its path, but this time its speed will be decreasing as gravity gradually slows it down. Then the graph of height versus time will be exactly the same.
 

Related Threads on Fundamental laws time reversal

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
588
Replies
1
Views
641
Top