Fundamental theorem of algebra and factoring?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the fundamental theorem of algebra and its relationship to the factorization of polynomials over the complex numbers. Participants explore whether the theorem's assertion about the existence of complex roots is equivalent to the ability to express any polynomial of degree n>0 as a product of linear factors.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that the fundamental theorem of algebra is equivalent to the statement that any polynomial can be factored into linear components.
  • Others provide a detailed argument showing how the theorem implies that a polynomial can be expressed in factored form, starting from the existence of a root.
  • One participant questions the equivalence and seeks clarification on any subtle distinctions that may exist between the two statements.
  • A later reply suggests referring to external resources for a proof, indicating that the discussion may benefit from additional context or formal justification.
  • Another participant acknowledges seeing the factored form in a proof but expresses uncertainty about its justification as being derived from the fundamental theorem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the fundamental theorem of algebra and the factorization of polynomials are equivalent. Some agree on the equivalence, while others raise questions about the nuances involved, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference algebraic identities and proofs, but there is no consensus on the clarity or sufficiency of these explanations. The discussion reflects varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the fundamental theorem and its implications.

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Is the fundamental theorem of algebra (for polynomials on the complex plane) equivalent to the statement that any polynomial p of degree n>0 can be written

p(z) = c(z - a_1 ) (z- a_2) \cdot \cdot \cdot (z - a_n )

or am I missing some subtle distinction? And if not equivalent, does the theorem imply this statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the "fundamental theorem of algebra" (every polynomial equation with complex coefficients has at least one complex root) is exactly equivalent to the statement that every polynomial over the complex numbers can be written as a product of linear factors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pellman
Yes, it is equivalent.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pellman
Starting with "fundamental theorem of algebra" (every polynomial equation with complex coefficients has at least one complex root)...say the root is ##a_1## then

##p (a_1) = ca_1^n + c_{n-1} a_1^{n-1} + c_{n-2} a_1^{n-2} + \dots + c_1a_1 + c_0 = 0##.

Write

##p(z) = p(z) - p(a_1) = c (z^n - a_1^n) + c_{n-1} (z^{n-1} - a_1^{n-1}) + c_{n-2} (a_1^{n-2} - z^{n-2}) + \dots + c_1 (z - a_1) \quad Eq1##

and use the algebraic identity:

##z^k - a_1^k = (z - a_1) (z^{k-1} + a_1 z^{k-2} + a_1^2 z^{k-3} + \dots + a_1^{k-2} z + a_1^{k-1})##

to factor out ##(z - a_1)## from every term in Eq1, reducing it to the form:

##p(z) = c (z - a_1) q(z)##

where ##q(z)## is a polynomial of order ##n-1##:

##q(z) = z^{n-1} + d_{n-2} z^{n-2} + \dots + d_1 z + d_0##.

We then apply the fundamental theorem of algebra to ##q(z)## and iterate.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pellman
HallsofIvy said:
No, the "fundamental theorem of algebra" (every polynomial equation with complex coefficients has at least one complex root) is exactly equivalent to the statement that every polynomial over the complex numbers can be written as a product of linear factors.
What do you mean? Isn't that what the OP wants to present?
 
Thanks, all. I saw the factored form in a proof without justification and figured it was the Fundamental Theorem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K