Fundamental Theorem of Calculus - Variables x and t

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, specifically the relationship between the variables x and t in integrals. It clarifies that in the expression ∫[b,a] f(t)dt, the variable t is simply a dummy variable and can be replaced with x without affecting the result. The integral's notation suggests that integration can occur with respect to either variable, but both represent the same function evaluated at different limits. The key takeaway is that differentiation and integration are inverse operations, and the choice of variable name does not change the underlying mathematical principles. Understanding this distinction helps clarify the confusion surrounding the integration process.
Sir James
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm getting slightly confused by the following so was hoping someone may be able to clear my problem up.

For integrals, if b is the upper limit and a is the lower limit, I will write ∫[b,a].

From the Fundamental Theorem of calculus part 1 we can show that:

if
F(x) = ∫[x,a] f(t)dt
then
F'(x) = f(x)
where F'(x) is the derivative of F(x) with respect to x
I understand the proof so will not detail.

From this, we can deduce part 2, that:

if
G(x) is any anti-derivative of f(x)
then
∫[b,a] f(t)dt = G(b)-G(a) = G(x) (evaluated at b) - G(x) (evaluated at a)
I understand the proof here also.

However, what I don't understand is that part 2 is actually written:

∫[b,a] f(x)dx = G(b)-G(a)

This notation suggests that integrating with respect to the x, being the term after the integrand is acceptable. However, we actually obtain the proof by finding the anti-derivative w.r.t. x when x was the upper limit in the summation.

My question is - what is the step that seems to be missing seeing as in the second law we actually integrate with respect to what was previously denoted as t? I understand that x and t are two different variables but they are obviously closely related - is it a case that t is dependent on x? If we can integrate w.r.t. either x or t surely they are equal and vary on a 1 to 1 ratio?

Thanks for the help,

James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to say, there was no variable t, t was just a new name for x. You were always using x. The formula f(t) was just the formula f(x) with x renamed to t, no substitution was made.

Or I suppose one could say, t is a variable with exactly the same rate of change as x. I don't think it matters really, the formula is the same. I much prefer thinking of it as just a name change.
 
Last edited:
In \int_a^b f(t)dt, t is a dummy variable. It does not appear in the final result so it can be changed at will: \int_a^b f(t)dt= \int_a^b f(x)dx= \int_a^b f(y)dy, etc.

This is the same as the "dummy index" in a sum: \sum_{n=0}^5 n^2= \sum_{j=0}^5 j^2 because they are both equal to 0^2+ 1^2+ 2^2+ 3^2+ 4^2+ 5^2= 0+ 1+ 4+ 9+ 16+ 25= 55.
 
Be sure not to lose the forrest for the trees ...

The Fundamental Theorem's meaning is that
Differentiation and Integration are Inverse Functions/Operations
 
Thanks for the responses Verty, HallsofIvy and Paulfr
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K