MHB Complex Square Root Function: Qs from Bruce P. Palka's Ex. 1.5, Ch. III

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on Example 1.5 from Chapter III of Bruce P. Palka's "An Introduction to Complex Function Theory," specifically addressing continuity and limits of complex functions. Participants clarify that the continuity of the function $$\theta$$ on the domain $$D = \mathbb{C} \sim ( - \infty, 0]$$ ensures that the function $$f$$ is also continuous in $$D$$ due to the composition of continuous functions. Additionally, they explain that the limit $$\lim_{ h \to 0+ } \theta (z_0 - ih) = - \pi$$ holds true when $$z_0$$ is real and negative, placing it in the fourth quadrant. Lastly, the assertion $$-i \sqrt{ \mid z_0 \mid } = - \sqrt{z_0}$$ is validated under the same condition of $$z_0$$ being real and negative.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and their continuity
  • Familiarity with limits in complex analysis
  • Knowledge of the properties of square roots in the complex plane
  • Basic concepts of analytic functions as outlined in complex function theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the continuity of complex functions, focusing on the composition of functions
  • Research the properties of limits in the context of complex analysis
  • Examine the implications of quadrant placement on limits of complex functions
  • Learn about the behavior of square roots in complex analysis, particularly for negative real numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to continuity and limits in complex functions.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Bruce P. Palka's book: An Introduction to Complex Function Theory ...

I am focused on Chapter III: Analytic Functions, Section 1.2 Differentiation Rules ...

I need further help with other aspects of Example 1.5, Section 1.2, Chapter III ...

Example 1.5, Section 1.2, Chapter III, reads as follows:

View attachment 9337
View attachment 9338
My questions are as follows:
Question 1

In the above text by Palka we read the following:" ... ... Recall that the function $$\theta$$ is continuous on the set $$D = \mathbb{C} \sim ( - \infty, 0]$$ (Lemma II.2.4), a fact that makes it clear that $$f$$, too, is continuous in $$D$$ ... ... "

How/why exactly does the fact that $$\theta$$ is continuous on the set $$D$$ imply that $$f$$ is continuous in D ... ...
Question 2

In the above text by Palka we read the following:" ... ... we observe that $$\lim_{ h \to 0+ } \theta (z_0 - ih) = - \pi$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain how/why $$\lim_{ h \to 0+ } \theta (z_0 - ih) = - \pi$$ ... ...
Question 3

In the above example Palka asserts that $$-i \sqrt{ \mid z_0 \mid } = - \sqrt{z_0}$$ ...

Can someone please demonstrate how/why this is the case ...
Help with the above questions will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Palka - 1 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 1 ... .png
    Palka - 1 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 1 ... .png
    1.7 KB · Views: 128
  • Palka - 2 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 2 ... .png
    Palka - 2 - Example 1.5, Section III - PART 2 ... .png
    28.3 KB · Views: 146
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I am reading Bruce P. Palka's book: An Introduction to Complex Function Theory ...

I am focused on Chapter III: Analytic Functions, Section 1.2 Differentiation Rules ...

I need further help with other aspects of Example 1.5, Section 1.2, Chapter III ...

Example 1.5, Section 1.2, Chapter III, reads as follows:
My questions are as follows:
Question 1

In the above text by Palka we read the following:" ... ... Recall that the function $$\theta$$ is continuous on the set $$D = \mathbb{C} \sim ( - \infty, 0]$$ (Lemma II.2.4), a fact that makes it clear that $$f$$, too, is continuous in $$D$$ ... ... "

How/why exactly does the fact that $$\theta$$ is continuous on the set $$D$$ imply that $$f$$ is continuous in D ... …
Because \sqrt{|z|}, |z| being positive, is continuous, and the composition of continuous functions is continuous.
Question 2
In the above text by Palka we read the following:" ... ... we observe that $$\lim_{ h \to 0+ } \theta (z_0 - ih) = - \pi$$ ... ... "Can someone please explain how/why $$\lim_{ h \to 0+ } \theta (z_0 - ih) = - \pi$$ ... …
You have dropped the condition that "[math]z_0[/math] is real and negative". Since z=[math]z_0[/math] is real and negative, the real part of [math]z_0- ih[/math] is [math]z_0[/math] and the imaginary part is [math]-ih[/math], both negative numbers. We are in the fourth quadrant so the limit is [math]-\pi[/math] rather than [math]\pi[/math].

Question 3
In the above example Palka asserts that $$-i \sqrt{ \mid z_0 \mid } = - \sqrt{z_0}$$ ...

Can someone please demonstrate how/why this is the case …
Again that is true because, in this case, [math]z_0[/math] assumed to be "real and negative".
Help with the above questions will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
HallsofIvy said:
Because \sqrt{|z|}, |z| being positive, is continuous, and the composition of continuous functions is continuous.
You have dropped the condition that "[math]z_0[/math] is real and negative". Since z=[math]z_0[/math] is real and negative, the real part of [math]z_0- ih[/math] is [math]z_0[/math] and the imaginary part is [math]-ih[/math], both negative numbers. We are in the fourth quadrant so the limit is [math]-\pi[/math] rather than [math]\pi[/math].


Again that is true because, in this case, [math]z_0[/math] assumed to be "real and negative".


Thanks for the help, HallsofIvy ...

You write ...

"Because \sqrt{|z|}, |z| being positive, is continuous, and the composition of continuous functions is continuous. ... "

Can you please show how to demonstrate that \sqrt{|z|} is continuous ...

I know we require that $$\lim_{ z \to z_0 } \sqrt{|z|} = \sqrt{|z_0|}$$ but why exactly is this true?

Can you help?

Peter
 
As shown by this animation, the fibers of the Hopf fibration of the 3-sphere are circles (click on a point on the sphere to visualize the associated fiber). As far as I understand, they never intersect and their union is the 3-sphere itself. I'd be sure whether the circles in the animation are given by stereographic projection of the 3-sphere from a point, say the "equivalent" of the ##S^2## north-pole. Assuming the viewpoint of 3-sphere defined by its embedding in ##\mathbb C^2## as...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K