MHB Gabrielle's question at Yahoo Answers regarding related rates

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Related rates
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

This is a calculus I question in the section about related rates.?

This is a calculus I question in the section about related rates.
A street light is at the top of a 13.000 ft. tall pole. A man 6.100 ft tall walks away from the pole with a speed of 6.000 feet/sec along a straight path. How fast is the tip of his shadow moving when he is 33.000 feet from the pole?

Here is a link to the question:

This is a calculus I question in the section about related rates.? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Gabrielle,

I like to work problems like this in general terms, derive a formula, then plug in the given data at the end. First let's draw a diagram. $L$ represents the height of the light pole, $M$ represents the height of the man, $x$ represents the distance of the man from the pole, and $s$ represents the length of the man's shadow:

2hzkf83.jpg


By similarity, we may state:

$$\frac{L}{x+s}=\frac{M}{s}$$

Cross-multiply:

$$Ls=M(x+s)$$

Solve for $s$:

$$(L-M)s=Mx$$

$$s=\frac{M}{L-M}x$$

Now, differentiate with respect to time $t$:

$$\frac{ds}{dt}=\frac{M}{L-M}\cdot\frac{dx}{dt}$$

This is the rate of growth of the length of the shadow. To find how fast the tip $T$ of the shadow is changing, we need to add $$\frac{dx}{dt}$$ as this growth is relative to the man's position:

$$\frac{dT}{dt}=\frac{M}{L-M}\cdot \frac{dx}{dt}+\frac{dx}{dt}= \frac{dx}{dt}\left(\frac{M}{L-M}+1 \right)= \frac{dx}{dt}\cdot\frac{L}{L-M}$$

We see that this is constant, i.e., it does not depend on how far the man is from the pole. So, plugging in the given data, we find:

$$\frac{dT}{dt}=\left(6\,\frac{\text{ft}}{\text{s}} \right)\left(\frac{13\text{ ft}}{(13-6.1)\text{ ft}} \right)=\frac{260}{23}\,\frac{\text{ft}}{\text{s}}$$

Since the given data is accurate to 3 decimal places, we round the final result to:

$$\frac{dT}{dt}\approx11.304\,\frac{\text{ft}}{\text{s}}$$

To Gabrielle and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other related rates problems in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f10/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top