Galilean Transformations and Postulates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Galilean transformations, specifically their mathematical representation and underlying postulates. The transformations are defined as: constant velocity transform (t,x) → (t,x+vt), translation transform (t,x) → (t+t0,x+x0), and rotation transformation (t,x) → (t,Rx). The key postulates state that two observers measure the same time between events and the same distance for simultaneous events. The conversation also explores the implications of uniformly accelerated reference frames, as described in V. Arnold's "Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics," highlighting that such transformations still qualify as Galilean transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Galilean transformations
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of mathematical representations of physical laws
  • Basic grasp of the Poincaré group in relation to relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of Galilean transformations
  • Explore the implications of uniformly accelerated reference frames in classical mechanics
  • Learn about the Poincaré group and its significance in special relativity
  • Investigate the differences between Galilean and Lorentz transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics and relativity, as well as educators seeking to deepen their understanding of transformation principles in physics.

RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
I read that the form of a galilean transformation on the point (t,x) is the following:

constant velocity transform by velocity v: (t,x) ---> (t,x+vt)
translation transform by (t0,x0): (t,x)--->(t+t0,x+x0)
rotation transformation by rotation matrix R: (t,x)--->(t,Rx)

and that it is based on the following postulates: two observers observe the same time between events, and two observers measure the same distance for simultaneous events.

My question is, based on those two postulates, couldn't you modify the first transform to

(t,x)--->(t,x+vf(t))

This transformation preserves the time between events (it doesn't change time at all). It also preserves simultaneous distance:

|(x1+vf(t))-(x2+vf(t))|=|x1-x2|
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yeah, doesn't that just correspond to moving with an arbitrary velocity v(t)=vf(t)?
 
darkSun said:
Yeah, doesn't that just correspond to moving with an arbitrary velocity v(t)=vf(t)?

Yeah, but unfortunately the book I'm using (Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, V. Arnold) emphasizes that v is uniform.

If you take the simplest case of a uniformily accelerated reference frame, then the transformation would look like:

(t,x)--->(t,x+.5*g*t2)

This transformation preserves the time between two events, and the distance between simultaneous events. So two observers, one uniformily accelerating with respect to the other, observe the same time between events and the same distance between simultaneous events.

So according to Arnold, such a transformation is a gallilean transformation.

Bringing in relativity, things are much different. Instead of preserving time between events and distance between simultaneous events separately, you consider transformations that preserve:

(ct)^2-(x)^2

Here you can show that the Poincare group (as opposed to the gallilean group) is a 10-parameter group consisting of uniform boosts, rotations, and translations. The boosts have to be uniform and can't be a function of spacetime.

But it seems in classical mechanics, according to Arnold, you can have boosts that depend on time (so reference frames can be accelerated), although not space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K