Gamma factor when doing four momentum problems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the gamma factor in four momentum problems, specifically addressing the expression for the gamma factor, which is correctly defined as ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}##. The participants clarify that the gamma factor can drop out in certain scenarios, such as when one particle is stationary, leading to a simplification in the momentum equations. The conservation of momentum is emphasized, particularly in collisions involving stationary and moving particles, where the correct formulation is ##P_1^2 + P_2^2 + 2P_1 \cdot P_2 = P_3^2##. Misunderstandings regarding the gamma factor's role in these equations are addressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four momentum vectors in relativistic physics
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz factor and its mathematical formulation
  • Knowledge of conservation laws in particle physics
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations involving vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Lorentz factor in various scenarios
  • Explore conservation of momentum in relativistic collisions
  • Learn about four-momentum conservation in particle physics
  • Investigate examples of four momentum calculations in high-energy physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students studying relativity, and anyone interested in understanding particle collisions and four momentum calculations in high-energy physics.

bonbon22
Messages
92
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Why does the gamma factor drop off when doing a four momentum problem?
Relevant Equations
ϒ = gamma factor = lorentz factor = 1-( v^2/c^2)
So if i had this problem where i am squaring a four momentum vector with itself which gives

P2 = (##\gamma mc## )2 - ##\gamma##2## m ##2##\vec v## *##\vec v##

I have been told that the gamma factor is not considered at all. why would the gamma factor drop off? Does this rule apply to any four momentum problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, you have the wrong expression for the gamma factor, i.e., you have written ##\gamma = 1 - v^2/c^2## when it should be ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}##. That it falls out from the expression for ##P^2## is basic algebra from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bonbon22
Orodruin said:
First of all, you have the wrong expression for the gamma factor, i.e., you have written ##\gamma = 1 - v^2/c^2## when it should be ##\gamma = 1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}##. That it falls out from the expression for ##P^2## is basic algebra from there.
If i had this other scenario where one proton is smashing into another which is stationary. Which creates a new particle, also stationary. Then balancing the four momentum i get P1 + P2 = P3 squaring i get P1^2 + P2^2 +P1.P2 =P3^2 . Since particle 2 let's say in this case is stationary the v2 becomes zero so using the Lorentz factor equation plugging in i get gamma 2 = 1. So is it possible then for the P1.P2 term to lose the gamma1 factor?
 
bonbon22 said:
If i had this other scenario where one proton is smashing into another which is stationary. Which creates a new particle, also stationary.
This would violate conservation of momentum as you would have non-zero momentum before the collision and zero momentum after.

bonbon22 said:
P1^2 + P2^2 +P1.P2 =P3^2
It should be ##p_1^2 + p_2^2 + 2p_1 \cdot p_2 = p_3^2##.
bonbon22 said:
So is it possible then for the P1.P2 term to lose the gamma1 factor?
It is not clear to me exactly what you are asking here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
987
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K