Gamma radiation photoelectric effect

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the photoelectric effect and the reasons gamma radiation is not utilized for energy capture. While gamma rays possess higher energy due to their frequency, they interact differently with matter compared to visible light, primarily affecting core-level energy states and nuclei rather than liberating conduction electrons. This complexity, along with the dangers associated with gamma radiation and its rarity, makes it impractical for energy conversion compared to solar panels that utilize sunlight safely and effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the photoelectric effect as described by Einstein
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic radiation and its frequency-energy relationship
  • Familiarity with conduction and valence bands in metals
  • Basic principles of nuclear physics and gamma radiation interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between the photoelectric effect and other photon interaction phenomena
  • Study the principles of gamma radiation and its applications in nuclear physics
  • Explore solar panel technology and the efficiency of energy conversion from sunlight
  • Investigate the safety measures and regulations surrounding the use of gamma radiation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, energy engineers, and anyone interested in the applications of electromagnetic radiation in energy conversion technologies.

Thundagere
Messages
159
Reaction score
0
I read earlier that the photoelectric effect is when electromagnetic radiation essentially overcomes an electrons binding energy and converts it to electricity, which is how solar panels function.
But why is it that gamma radiation isn't being used to capture energy? If gamma radiation has a higher frequency, then it should have more energy, and thus the KE of the released electrons should be more. So why is this not currently being done? Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are missing is that Gamma rays are both deadly and rare. Sunlight is much safer and available almost everywhere.
 
To add to what Antiphon said, try doing a calculation where the output of 1 Curie of Cobalt-60 is completely converted to electricity using a solar panel, and you'll see just how little wattage this produces from a dangerously high 1 Curie source.
 
Thundagere said:
I read earlier that the photoelectric effect is when electromagnetic radiation essentially overcomes an electrons binding energy and converts it to electricity, which is how solar panels function.
But why is it that gamma radiation isn't being used to capture energy? If gamma radiation has a higher frequency, then it should have more energy, and thus the KE of the released electrons should be more. So why is this not currently being done? Am I missing something?

There's a little bit of misunderstanding here.

The "photoelectric effect" that we normally deal with is the phenomenon of light impinging on a surface, and then the liberation of electrons from that surface. In fact, if we want to be even more precise, the phenomenon that is described via the Einstein photoelectric effect is the impinging of light of a certain frequency range on a metallic surface.

What this means is that it is the liberation of the conduction electrons that has overcome the work function of the metal. This is important to note because it is no longer a scenario that involves isolated atoms for one very obvious reason - isolated atoms do not have conduction/valence bands.

Now, the problem with gamma rays is that the interaction can be very different. Where there is a certain small probability of a "photoelectric effect" type phenomenon, gamma rays tend to interact more with not only a deeper, core-level energy states, but also with the nucleus of the material. When that occurs, you are no longer in the "photoelectric effect" regime (Einstein's equation no longer works). You can have a number of different phenomena going on - nuclear excitation, different types of scattering, etc.. etc. You just don't get a simple "electrons emitted at higher energy" phenomenon. Even x-rays can induce more complicated processes (that's why x-ray detectors are not some simple photodetectors that we use for UV/visible/IR range).

The higher the energy of the photon, the more exotic/complex processes that can occur when it interacts with matter.

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K