Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy SCA vs. MCA

  1. Jun 14, 2015 #1
    A single-channel analyser (SCA) counts the number of voltage pulses whose height falls within an adjustable range.

    A multi-channel analyser (MCA) sorts the pulses according to height and counts the number in each spectral window to give a spectral energy distribution.

    Does this mean the resolution of spectrums with an MCA will be better than with a SCA? Are there any other advantages to using a MCA over a SCA? Are there any advantages to using a SCA over a MCA? I can't really think of any aside from resolution.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 14, 2015 #2

    jtbell

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    An MCA is basically a collection of many SCAs operating in parallel, with each one set to a different window (or channel). It takes much less time to accumulate the data for a complete spectrum, than with a single SCA that has to accumulate the channels one at a time.
     
  4. Jun 23, 2015 #3
    SCAs are useful in establishing coincidence between nuclear decays. It is better than most MCAs which must busy themselves digitizing many uninteresting events increasing the dead time.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy SCA vs. MCA
Loading...