ChrisVer
Science Advisor
- 3,372
- 465
again you talk about [itex]\delta \Gamma[/itex] while I don't know it... 
In general it's good to bring [itex]\delta \Gamma[/itex] in terms of [itex]\delta g[/itex] in the last expression I gave in the previous page (with the factors of 2 you added) and take the [itex]\delta g[/itex] out as a common factor...
Also get a factor from [itex]\sqrt{-g}[/itex] although that's the easiest part in your Lagrangian, since it will come in complete analogy:
[itex]\delta_g S_1 = \int d^{4} x L \delta \sqrt{-g} = -\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4} x \sqrt{-g}L g_{\mu \nu} \delta g^{\mu \nu}[/itex]
with [itex]L[/itex] your Lagrangian..and so you don't have to care about it aver again...in your last overall Eom just add that term: [itex]-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}L g_{\mu \nu} \delta g^{\mu \nu}[/itex]...

In general it's good to bring [itex]\delta \Gamma[/itex] in terms of [itex]\delta g[/itex] in the last expression I gave in the previous page (with the factors of 2 you added) and take the [itex]\delta g[/itex] out as a common factor...
Also get a factor from [itex]\sqrt{-g}[/itex] although that's the easiest part in your Lagrangian, since it will come in complete analogy:
[itex]\delta_g S_1 = \int d^{4} x L \delta \sqrt{-g} = -\frac{1}{2}\int d^{4} x \sqrt{-g}L g_{\mu \nu} \delta g^{\mu \nu}[/itex]
with [itex]L[/itex] your Lagrangian..and so you don't have to care about it aver again...in your last overall Eom just add that term: [itex]-\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{-g}L g_{\mu \nu} \delta g^{\mu \nu}[/itex]...