Gaussian Surface: Electric Field & dA Visualization

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on visualizing the area element dA in relation to electric fields from different charge distributions, specifically an infinitely long line charge and an infinite plane sheet of charge. It clarifies that dA, as a vector, should be oriented perpendicular to the surface and aligned with the direction of the electric field for effective calculations. The conversation emphasizes that while the curved surface of a cylinder has different orientations for dA, the correct choice is always perpendicular and directed outward from the surface. Additionally, it highlights the importance of considering all surfaces of the Gaussian surface, as only specific areas contribute to the electric flux. Ultimately, the participants express gratitude for the clarification of these concepts.
logearav
Messages
329
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the case of calculating electric field due to an infinitely long line charge, we assume cylinder to be a gaussian surface and electric field and small area element of the cylinder acts along the same direction at the curved surface and they act perpendicular direction at the plane faces.
in the case of electric field due to an infinite plane sheet of charge we again assume cylinder to be a Gaussian surface but in this case at the plane faces electric field and surface element dA acts along the same direction and they act perpendicular along the curved surface. i am confused. please let me know how to visualise area element dA. i know electric field vector acts perpendicular to the surface but how to know the direction of the area element dA? help in this regard is greatly appreciated

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, dA represented as a vector has a direction perpendicular to the surface element. If you know the direction of the electric field, a good choice of the dA vector orientation is in the same direction as the (local) electric field which makes the surface element perpendicular to the local electric field. Then the dot product E.dA becomes just the product of magnitudes E dA and you don't have to worry about the cosine of the angle between them because it is 1.

So if you have a positive point charge that radiates electric field lines radially outward, what would be a good choice of dA? And when you have many such dAs next to one another, what kind of Gaussian surface do you get?
 
but sir, if i draw a cylinder the plance face is elliptical in shape. dA should be perpendicular to the surface. i can draw dA in top direction, right direction and left direction. all these directions are perpendicular to the surface. what is the correct choice of direction.
 
The correct choice of direction is perpendicular and away from the cylinder. Please look up "Gaussian surface" in wikipedia. There is a decent drawing of a cylindrical Gaussian surface for a linear charge distribution with elements dA drawn in. A picture is worth a thousand words. If you still have questions after you study the wikipedia article, please ask again.
 
I think people are glossing over the fact that there is a radial ds vector as well. Just because the flux is zero there doesn't mean it isn't a valid direction. All three surfaces need to be taken into account, the two caps and the cylinder itself. When you do the calculations you will see that only the two caps contribute to the field and I guess this is why everyone is ignoring the cylinder itself.
 
Thanks a lot mr.kuruman and mr. cyosis. now i understood the concept. thanks for sparing your valuable time.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
659
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K