Gauss's law:E vs r graph (two cases of shell)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Shell
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on Gauss's law and the electric field (E) variations in relation to a charged shell. Two cases are analyzed: a shell with charges only on its surface, where the electric field E is zero for r PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of Gauss's law
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts
  • Knowledge of charge distribution types
  • Basic calculus for interpreting E vs R graphs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gauss's law applications in electrostatics
  • Learn about electric field calculations for different charge distributions
  • Explore the implications of charge density (ρ) in electric fields
  • Investigate graphical representations of electric fields in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone studying electrostatics or preparing for exams involving electric fields and charge distributions.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83

Homework Statement


Ok.Then there was a question
If r is distance measured from center of a charged shell and R is it's radius then the graph which may correctly represent variations of electric field is

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTAWn-2hPoxdlZtV7zw5hQR8h-1MLTVoShJoGQsmJrwd6ebbsTfVw.png

media%2Fca6%2Fca6b7881-725e-43c3-b5be-88eb8fb653a9%2FphpPh04vU.png


Homework Equations


E vs R graph

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is given to be A but I want to ask why not C ?There are two cases
1-shell with all charges on surface in this case E for r<R is zero so Option A fits in
2-Shell with charges throughout the volume(volumetric distribution)
In which E for r<R has formula
E=ρr/3ε0 (ρ=CHARGE PER UNIT VOLUME)
it is clear E ∝ r
For this C seems correct.And the question does not clarify which type of shell(type 1 or type 2) is to be referred
So why answer is A?Why it can't be C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Shell" is usually intended to mean an infinitesimal (limit-zero thickness) surface.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
(limit-zero thickness) surface.
so no volume ?nearly 2d?
 
Yeah, no volume. The shell alone has no volume, but of course it encompasses certain volume inside it.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
671
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
497
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
4K