Gauss's law:E vs r graph (two cases of shell)

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Shell
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Gauss's law to analyze the electric field (E) as a function of distance (r) from the center of a charged shell. The original poster is comparing two cases of charge distribution on the shell: one where the charge is on the surface and another where it is distributed throughout the volume.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the reasoning behind the answer being option A instead of C, given the two different cases of charge distribution. They explore the implications of each case on the electric field and seek clarification on the type of shell referenced in the question.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaged in clarifying the definitions and implications of a "shell" in the context of the problem. Some have pointed out that a shell is typically understood as having no volume, which raises questions about the assumptions made in the original poster's reasoning.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that the question does not specify which type of shell is being referred to, leading to ambiguity in determining the correct answer. This lack of clarity is a focal point of the discussion.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83

Homework Statement


Ok.Then there was a question
If r is distance measured from center of a charged shell and R is it's radius then the graph which may correctly represent variations of electric field is

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTAWn-2hPoxdlZtV7zw5hQR8h-1MLTVoShJoGQsmJrwd6ebbsTfVw.png

media%2Fca6%2Fca6b7881-725e-43c3-b5be-88eb8fb653a9%2FphpPh04vU.png


Homework Equations


E vs R graph

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is given to be A but I want to ask why not C ?There are two cases
1-shell with all charges on surface in this case E for r<R is zero so Option A fits in
2-Shell with charges throughout the volume(volumetric distribution)
In which E for r<R has formula
E=ρr/3ε0 (ρ=CHARGE PER UNIT VOLUME)
it is clear E ∝ r
For this C seems correct.And the question does not clarify which type of shell(type 1 or type 2) is to be referred
So why answer is A?Why it can't be C?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Shell" is usually intended to mean an infinitesimal (limit-zero thickness) surface.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
(limit-zero thickness) surface.
so no volume ?nearly 2d?
 
Yeah, no volume. The shell alone has no volume, but of course it encompasses certain volume inside it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
753
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
5K