Gene expression during gastrulation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on experimental methods for comparing gene expression during gastrulation in birds and frogs. Key techniques mentioned include microarray analysis for screening multiple genes, in-situ hybridization for spatial expression data, and quantitative RT-PCR for comparing conserved genes across species. The consensus is that while microarrays are effective for broad screenings, in-situ hybridization and quantitative RT-PCR are preferable for specific gene expression studies, particularly when using conserved primers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Microarray analysis techniques
  • In-situ hybridization methodology
  • Quantitative RT-PCR principles
  • Understanding of gene conservation across species
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced microarray analysis techniques for comparative genomics
  • Explore in-situ hybridization protocols for developmental biology
  • Study quantitative RT-PCR applications in cross-species gene expression
  • Investigate gene conservation and primer design for comparative studies
USEFUL FOR

Developmental biologists, geneticists, and researchers interested in comparative gene expression studies during gastrulation in vertebrates.

jones106
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I've got a developmental question for yall. How would you experimentally compare gene expression during gastrulation in birds with that in frogs?
I've been racking my brain trying to think of this, and the only way I can think of is to use a microarray, since it allows you to look at so many different genes. However, I'm not sure if this is useful for comparing gene expression in two different animals. Can you use this method? Is there some sort of recombination/transplantation/knockout experiment you could use? Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I think in-situ hybridization is the way to go
 
If you're just looking for the time course of when genes get turned on, either approach would work. It depends on what your overall objectives are. If you're just trying to screen for many genes at once, microarray is good for that. If you have just one in mind, in situ hybridization will work, with the benefit of giving you information on where expression is occurring. RT-PCR could also be used to identify individual genes, but without the regional specificity of in situ hybridization.

None of these methods would work well to compare levels of expression quantitatively between two different species, because they all would require species-specific primers. However, if you had a gene of interest that was highly conserved between the two species, so that you could use the same primer, then you could use quantitative RT-PCR to compare the amount of gene expression.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K