Dreams: A Window Into Our Ancestor's Lives?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Olias
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dreams Window
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of whether dream experiences from parents or ancestors can be passed down genetically. Participants explore the idea that bizarre dreams might reflect ancestral life experiences, questioning if genetic code retains such information and influences subconscious thoughts. Some argue that while genes are an information coding system, they primarily mutate or shuffle rather than encode complex experiences like dreams. The conversation also touches on the potential for genetic engineering to store socially significant data in DNA, with references to genetic computing and the evolving understanding of "junk DNA." Overall, the thread highlights a blend of speculative ideas about genetics, memory, and the nature of dreams, while acknowledging the current scientific limitations in these areas.
Olias
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Can dream experience's from our Parents/Ancestors lives, be passed on via Genetic hereditary?

For instance, can some of my most bizarre dreams, actually be a replay of one of my ancestors life-experience..event?

The Timeline of experience (events), played out in my dreams seem to have no baring on my own real-life experience, so I am wondering if it is possible that genetic code somehow retains information of my ancestors/parents, and somehow throws it into my sub-conscious, which leaks out as Dream?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
The germ-line is set at birth, so no acquired traits and/or dreams will be passed.

Nautica
 
Olias said:
Can dream experience's from our Parents/Ancestors lives, be passed on via Genetic hereditary?

For instance, can some of my most bizarre dreams, actually be a replay of one of my ancestors life-experience..event?

The Timeline of experience (events), played out in my dreams seem to have no baring on my own real-life experience, so I am wondering if it is possible that genetic code somehow retains information of my ancestors/parents, and somehow throws it into my sub-conscious, which leaks out as Dream?

The 'PRIMITIVE TRACES' of what you are thinking now already exist. I have thoght long and hard on this for many years, but I am quite sure that no scientist in his/her clear mind would give this even a glance, let alone accept it. I am taking this your thinking a step further ... Parents will in the very nearest future write 'Gene-letters' to their future grand children, and so will eternal lovers.
 
The BIG Problem: Scientists only annex less than what the genes are capable of doing. Genes are an information coding system and this is not limited to biology. Genes also code information at multiple scientific levels, especially, substantially, at the level of physics. I predict that until we come to the appreciation of this fact, scientists would for a very long time to come underate and underutilise 'genetic abilities'.
 
Last edited:
Philocrat, you are joking right? DNA is relatively static and can only mutate or shuffle: information such as dreams can not become coded.
 
Storing text messages in DNA - possibilities for storing HTML et al

Monique said:
Philocrat said:
I am taking this your thinking a step further ... Parents will in the very nearest future write 'Gene-letters' to their future grand children
Philocrat, you are joking right? DNA is relatively static and can only mutate or shuffle: information such as dreams can not become coded.
Philocrat is not speaking of dreams. He is speaking of using genetic engineering to encode written language into "unused" portions of DNA. If we used four DNA bases per character, we would have 256 possibilities for each character (4^4). This many possibilities would allow the 26 letters of the alphabet, plus many puncuation characters and special characters, just like ASCII and ISO-8859, etc. On the other hand, we might just skip the plain text and instead encode HTML or JAVA or special programs. We might even add another chromosome to the human genome, just for storing computer programs. Thanks for the idea, Philocrat. I might put this in one of my novels.
 
Monique said:
Philocrat, you are joking right? DNA is relatively static and can only mutate or shuffle: information such as dreams can not become coded.

I am not joking...shuffling is a much smarter way to code. Yes, you may be right about DNA, but it's decisively so. By the way, I say 'Amen!' to your prayer.
 
Last edited:
hitssquad said:
Philocrat is not speaking of dreams. He is speaking of using genetic engineering to encode written language into "unused" portions of DNA. If we used four DNA bases per character, we would have 256 possibilities for each character (4^4). This many possibilities would allow the 26 letters of the alphabet, plus many puncuation characters and special characters, just like ASCII and ISO-8859, etc. On the other hand, we might just skip the plain text and instead encode HTML or JAVA or special programs. We might even add another chromosome to the human genome, just for storing computer programs. Thanks for the idea, Philocrat. I might put this in one of my novels.

Are you suggesting the possibility of 'GENETIC COMPUTING'? I thought that this was already possible? Am I wrong?
 
Genetic computing

Philocrat said:
Are you suggesting the possibility of 'GENETIC COMPUTING'?
No. I was only suggesting storing socially-significant-but-gentetically-insignificant data in genetic material. What is genetic computing besides an extra-genetic data-mining method specific to genomic data?
 
  • #10
hitssquad said:
No. I was only suggesting storing socially-significant-but-gentetically-insignificant data in genetic material. What is genetic computing besides an extra-genetic data-mining method specific to genomic data?

Thanks for clearing that up, pal!
 
  • #11
hitssquad said:
No. I was only suggesting storing socially-significant-but-gentetically-insignificant data in genetic material. What is genetic computing besides an extra-genetic data-mining method specific to genomic data?
This pre-supposes that we know what 'genetically-insignificant' in genetic material is! IIRC, what was once called 'junk DNA' is now seen - at least in part - as performing rather important functions (having rather important roles?); the genome may turn out to be even richer and more complex than our current understanding. (or not).
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
9K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K