General and Special Relativity Minkowski spaces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around concepts in general and special relativity, specifically focusing on Minkowski spaces and the associated metrics. Participants are exploring the mathematical representation of metrics and the implications of certain properties, such as the constancy of metric components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to describe the metric as a matrix and question the relationship between the components of the metric and their derivatives. There are discussions about the implications of the Christoffel symbols being zero and how that affects the geodesic equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and guidance on the relationships between metric components and their derivatives. Some participants are exploring specific cases and implications of their findings, while others are seeking clarification on their understanding of the concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a required course that some participants feel unprepared for, which may influence their engagement with the material. The discussion includes references to specific parts of the homework, indicating a structured approach to the problem set.

kikitard
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In attached image

Homework Equations


?

The Attempt at a Solution


?

A start would be fantastic!
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2013-03-05 at 10.51.23 PM.png
    Screen shot 2013-03-05 at 10.51.23 PM.png
    14.9 KB · Views: 606
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't have ANY idea how to start ANY of these you might be in the wrong course. 3(a) just wants you describe the metric as a matrix. If (dt,dx,dy) is the vector ##dx^\mu## what matrix ##g_{\mu \nu}## makes ##dx^\mu dx^\nu g_{\mu \nu}## equal to the metric expression?
 
I'm pretty sure I am in the wrong course, but it is required, which is why I've turned to the internet for help.

Am I correct in saying that the dxν = transpose of dxμ, and so gμν is the matrix with row vectors (-1,0,0) (0,1,0) (0,0,1), or am I off base?
 
kikitard said:
I'm pretty sure I am in the wrong course, but it is required, which is why I've turned to the internet for help.

Am I correct in saying that the dxν = transpose of dxμ, and so gμν is the matrix with row vectors (-1,0,0) (0,1,0) (0,0,1), or am I off base?

That's a good start. Absolutely right. Now try 3(b).
 
Using this formula (attached) can i retain the β in the formula, giving 1/2g[itex]\mu\beta((∂gβ\alpha/∂xβ)+(∂gββ/∂x\alpha)-(∂g\alpha\beta/∂xβ))[/itex]

we know gab=gba so the first and third terms in the brackets cancel
giving 1/2g[itex]\mu\beta(∂gββ/∂x\alpha)[/itex]
?
Would the partial derivative wrt xalpha be 0, as there are no xalpha terms contained in gββ?
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2013-03-06 at 12.01.56 AM.png
    Screen shot 2013-03-06 at 12.01.56 AM.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 519
kikitard said:
Using this formula (attached) can i retain the β in the formula, giving 1/2g[itex]\mu\beta((∂gβ\alpha/∂xβ)+(∂gββ/∂x\alpha)-(∂g\alpha\beta/∂xβ))[/itex]

we know gab=gba so the first and third terms in the brackets cancel
giving 1/2g[itex]\mu\beta(∂gββ/∂x\alpha)[/itex]
?
Would the partial derivative wrt xalpha be 0, as there are no xalpha terms contained in gββ?

That's hard to read. But all of the metric components are constant. So all of the partial derivatives of the metric are zero. So the Christoffel symbols are?
 
Dick said:
That's hard to read. But all of the metric components are constant. So all of the partial derivatives of the metric are zero. So the Christoffel symbols are?

Ahh that makes sense, all partial derivatives are zero, so the Christoffel is also zero.

for c) I managed to get the attached image as the geodesic with affine λ
in d) i must solve this (presuming i did it correctly), could you point me towards the right method?
 

Attachments

  • Screen shot 2013-03-06 at 12.46.19 AM.png
    Screen shot 2013-03-06 at 12.46.19 AM.png
    2 KB · Views: 511
for c) You derived the geodesic equation in general it looks like. You got the right answer for that, but you can also try to find the specific case geodesic equation.

Regardless, in part b) you found that the christoffel symbol was zero. What does that imply about your answer to part c)? Does that give you something easy to solve for part d)?
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
960
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K