General Question on Schwarzschild Metric

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Schwarzschild Metric, specifically its relationship to the curvature of gravitational fields as described by General Relativity. Participants explore whether the metric inherently contains information about curvature and how this relates to calculating space-time intervals in a gravitational field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the Schwarzschild Metric contains the curvature of the gravitational field within its time and spatial components.
  • Others suggest that the curvature can be derived from the metric by calculating the Riemann curvature tensor, which is dependent on the Christoffel symbols that in turn depend on the metric.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether using the Schwarzschild Metric for calculating space-time intervals automatically accounts for the curvature of the gravitational field.
  • Some responses affirm that the metric does account for curvature, indicating that one does not need to solve for the curvature tensor to determine proper time or distance.
  • There is a discussion about the observer-dependent nature of space and time, suggesting that the understanding of these dimensions may vary based on perspective.
  • Participants consider the possibility of describing the geometry of space-time around a spherical mass by calculating proper distances and angles, drawing parallels to geometric properties on a sphere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While there is some agreement that the Schwarzschild Metric accounts for curvature in calculations of space-time intervals, the discussion includes differing views on the interpretation of space and time, as well as the implications of these interpretations for understanding the metric.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the traditional view of space and time as separate dimensions versus a more integrated perspective of a four-dimensional manifold. The discussion also highlights the complexity of deriving curvature from the metric and the potential for varying interpretations of geometric properties.

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,850
Reaction score
553
Hi guys I have a quick question on the Schwarzschild Metric:
Since the metric is a solution to the EFEs does it intrinsically have the curvature of the gravitational field embedded in the metric? If so is it represented by the time and spatial components of the metric? If not could you please explain what those two components describe. Also, if the curvature isn't directly shown in the metric how exactly would one go about finding it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given the metric, you can calculate first the Christoffel symbols, and then the curvature tensor - to be precise, the Riemann curvature tensor. There are other curvature tensors used in GR , .e. the Ricci tensor and the Einstein tensor. The Ricci tensor can be expressed as the contraction of the Riemann, i.e R^ab = R^ab_ab. The Einstein tensor can be expressed in terms of the Ricci tensor, the metric, and a constant obtained by contracting the Ricci, i.e. R = R^a_a, G_ab = R_ab - (R/2) g_ab.

I'm not sure if the tensor equations will make sense to you, but offhand I'm not sure how to eliminate them without writing a much much longer post.

You might try http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/einstein/
 
Sorry I phrased my question terribly. What I meant to ask was:
When people describe the Scwarzschild metric (or any space - time metric for that matter) they say it describes the geometry of the gravitational field for the given mass - energy distribution. So does the metric have the curvature of the field embedded in it such that when you are calculating space - time intervals in the field it automatically takes the curvature into account? And the actual value for the curvature would be calculated from the Riemann curvature tensor?
 
WannabeNewton said:
So does the metric have the curvature of the field embedded in it such that when you are calculating space - time intervals in the field it automatically takes the curvature into account? And the actual value for the curvature would be calculated from the Riemann curvature tensor?

Yes, because in GR eventually you calculate the Riemann tensor from that particular metric.

In short, the Riemann tensor depends on the Christoffel symbols, and the Christoffel symbols depend on the metric.
 
So it would be safe to say that when calculating space - time intervals using the Schwarzschild metric it intrinsically accounts for the curvature of the gravitational field around it (for a static and spherically symmetric object)? I need not solve the curvature tensor to account for the proper time or proper distance resulting from the curved geometry?
 
WannabeNewton said:
So it would be safe to say that when calculating space - time intervals using the Schwarzschild metric it intrinsically accounts for the curvature of the gravitational field around it (for a static and spherically symmetric object)? I need not solve the curvature tensor to account for the proper time or proper distance resulting from the curved geometry?

Yes, that's right.
 
Sorry just one last question:
Could you then describe the geometry of the space - time around the spherical mass by calculating a large number of proper distances for intervals around the given mass and culminating them together?
 
WannabeNewton said:
Since the metric is a solution to the EFEs does it intrinsically have the curvature of the gravitational field embedded in the metric? If so is it represented by the time and spatial components of the metric?
A little difficult to explain and a little controversial because traditionally most people like to view spacetime as three dimensions and time as a separate dimension.

However what is space and what is time is really observer dependent it is not a dimension of the manifold.

Thus it is better to think of a curved 4 dimensional manifold in which different observers have their own perspective of which 'mixture' of these 4 dimensions represent time and space to them.
 
Last edited:
WannabeNewton said:
Sorry just one last question:
Could you then describe the geometry of the space - time around the spherical mass by calculating a large number of proper distances for intervals around the given mass and culminating them together?
Distances and angles, yes. Consider the geometry on the surface of a sphere. If you make a triangle on the sphere you will wind up with three distances which could indeed represent the sides of a triangle in a flat space, but the sum of the interior angles will be greater than 180° which will let you know that the space is curved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K