General relativity question - geodesics.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in general relativity concerning geodesics in a specific spacetime metric, referred to as "Flat Earth" spacetime. The metric provided involves a gravitational constant and requires participants to derive geodesic equations and analyze the implications for a stationary observer's measurement of gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Euler-Lagrange equation to derive geodesic equations, with some questioning the correctness of terms and expressions used. There are attempts to clarify the derivation of certain equations and the proper form of the Lagrangian.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's derivations and identifying potential errors in reasoning. Some have successfully derived results using different methods, while others express confusion about discrepancies in their calculations. There is no explicit consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific requirements for the derivation and presentation of results. There are indications of missing information or assumptions that are being questioned throughout the discussion.

ghetom
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I'm doing some revision for a General relativity exam, and came across this question:

A Flat Earth space-time has co-ordinates (t, x, y, z), where z > 0, and a metric

ds2 = ((1 + gz)2)dt2 − dx2 − dy2 − dz2

where g is a positive constant.
Write down the geodesic equations in this space-time.

Hence, or otherwise, show that A Flat Earth physicist, stationary at a point with z = h, will measure a ‘gravitational acceleration’ of magnitude g(1 + gh)−1

---//---

I've solved the geodesics, but can't get the 'show that' at the end:

Using the Euler-Lagrange equation:

\stackrel{d}{ds} \stackrel{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x^{\mu}}} - \stackrel{\partial L}{\partial x^{\mu}} =0

I get

\ddot{z} = 2g(1+gz)\dot{t}^2

And

\dot{t} = E/(1+gz)^2 ( where E is a constant )

So

\ddot{z} = g{E^2}/(1+gz)^3

which isn't right. Alternatively,

\ddot{z}= \dot{t}^2 z'' + \ddot{t}z' ( where ' is (d/dt) )

it's stationary, so z' = 0 thus z''=\ddot{z}/\dot{t}^2=2g(1+gz)

which still isn't right. Any takers?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the two in your geodesic equation shouldn't be there. You probably missed the 1/2 in the Christoffel symbol. Moreover you made a mistake in trying to find an expression for (dt/ d\tau)^2. Can you show us how you obtained your expression?
 
Last edited:
Yes the 2 is wrong. My apologies.

For the mu = 0 equation I have:

(d/ds)(2\dot{t}(1+gz)^2) =0

thus

\dot{t} (1+gz)^2 = constant

also

\ddot{z} = \dot{t}d\dot{z}/dt = \dot{t}(d/dt)(\dot{t}z') = \dot{t}(z'(d\dot{t})/dt +\dot{t}z'')=\dot{t}^2z''+\ddot{t}z'
 
Last edited:
Update: I've now solved it using the Christoffel symbols, but am still confused as to why the Euler-Lagrange method hasn't worked.This is wrong:
\ddot{z} = -g{\dot{t}^2}(1+gz) (1)

It should read:

\ddot{z} =-g{\dot{t}^2}/(1+gz) (2)

I got (1) direct from the EL equation

-2\ddot{z} - {\dot{t}^2}d_{z}(1+gz)^2 = 0 (3)
 
Last edited:
You're probably losing terms in places where you should be summing over the indices. Using the EL-equations I end up with \ddot{z}-g(1+gz)\dot{t}^2 =0.

Your second equation is wrong as well. Did you derive that one using the geodesic equation? Either way I just calculated it both ways and I get the same result, as it should be. I can't be of further assistance unless you show me your full derivation. Also I don't think you have gotten your \dot{t} correct yet.
 
Last edited:
Thanks. Given that's the case then z''=\ddot{z}/\dot{t}^2=g(1+gz) can't be true (since this is the wrong answer).

I can't see any thing wrong for \dot{t}:

whats wrong with:
L = (1+gz)^2dt^2-dx^2-dy^2-dz^2)

therefore by EL:

(d/ds)(2\dot{t}(1+gz)^2) =0

so

\dot{t} (1+gz)^2 = constant
 
Your Lagrangian is wrong, recall L=g_{\alpha \beta}\dot{x}^\alpha\dot{x}^\beta=(1+gz)^2 \dot{t}^2-\dot{x}^2-\dot{y}^2-\dot{z}^2.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K