lep11
- 380
- 7
##d(0, a) \le d(0, z) + d(z, a)## ⇔ ## d(0, z) ≥ d(0, a)-d(z, a) ##PeroK said:It's just the triangle inequality again:
##d(0, a) \le d(0, z) + d(z, a)##
The discussion revolves around the set A defined as A:={x∈ℝ² : 1 Some participants have suggested that the set can be expressed as an intersection of open sets, while others are questioning the necessity of proving the openness of open balls, given that they are defined as such in the topology. There is a recognition of the need for a formal proof, and various lines of reasoning are being explored without reaching a consensus. There is mention of confusion regarding the definitions and properties of open sets, bases, and the relationship between metric spaces and topological spaces. Some participants express uncertainty about the original set of open sets provided for the topology.Discussion Character
Approaches and Questions Raised
Discussion Status
Contextual Notes
##d(0, a) \le d(0, z) + d(z, a)## ⇔ ## d(0, z) ≥ d(0, a)-d(z, a) ##PeroK said:It's just the triangle inequality again:
##d(0, a) \le d(0, z) + d(z, a)##
lep11 said:##d(0, a) \le d(0, z) + d(z, a)## ⇔ ## d(0, z) ≥ d(0, a)-d(z, a) ##
lep11 said:## d(0, z) ≥ d(0, a)-d(z,a) > d(0,a)>1 ##
What's wrong?PeroK said:That middle equality cannot be correct. ##d(0, a)-d(z,a) \le d(0,a)## surely?
lep11 said:What's wrong?
Okay, true.PeroK said:Come on! If you take a positive number away what you have gets smaller.
I took a break and tried again.lep11 said:Okay, true.
I might just give up. I am not smart enough to study crap like this.