Generating function for Legendre polynomials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship involving Legendre polynomials using binomial expansion. The original poster attempts to manipulate a series expression to show that a specific function can be represented as a sum of Legendre polynomials multiplied by a variable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various manipulations of series and summations, including the application of binomial expansion and rearranging terms. There are questions about how to simplify expressions and how to align them with known definitions of Legendre polynomials.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on rearranging terms and applying different forms of the binomial theorem. There is an ongoing exploration of how to collect like powers of the variable and how these relate to the Legendre polynomial definitions. Multiple interpretations of the expressions are being considered, and progress is being made towards a clearer understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the depth of assistance provided. There is also a focus on ensuring that the manipulations align with the definitions and properties of Legendre polynomials.

NanakiXIII
Messages
391
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using binomial expansion, prove that

[tex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - 2 x u + u^2}} = \sum_{k} P_k(x) u^k.[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex] \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 + v}} = \sum_{k} (-1)^k \frac{(2k)!}{2^{2k} (k!)^2} v^k[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I simply inserted [itex]v = u^2 - 2 x u[/itex], then expanded the [itex]v^k[/tex] to obtain the double sum<br /> <br /> [tex] \sum_{k} (-1)^k \frac{(2k)!}{2^{2k} (k!)^2} \sum_{n \leq k} \left( \begin{array}{c} k \\ n \end{array} \right) (-2 x)^n u^{2 k - n}.[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now I need to turn this into a single sum by collecting like powers of [itex]u[/itex], which is what I'm stuck at. I don't see how to go about that.[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might find this relationship helpful. It's just a rearrangement of terms in a series.

[tex]\sum_{p=0}^\infty\sum_{q=0}^p\,a_{q,p-q} = \sum_{r=0}^\infty\sum_{s=0}^{[r/2]}\,a_{s,r-2s}[/tex]

where [r/2] = r/2 if r is even or (r-1)/2 if r is odd.
 
I suppose you mean to apply this using [itex]p = 2 k[/itex], so that my powers of [itex]u[/itex] become [itex]2 k - 2 n[/itex] instead of [itex]2 k - n[/itex]? I'm not sure how that simplifies things. I'm still not sure what kind of expressions I'm going to get in front of my [itex]u[/itex]'s.
 
I think you have to have p=k and q=n from comparing your expression to the LHS of the relationship.

What definition do you have for the Legendre polynomials? I'm wondering what you should be shooting for.
 
You can factor out uk from the second summation and swap the exponents on the (-2x) and u to get

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^\infty (-1)^k \frac{(2k)!}{2^{2k} (k!)^2} u^k \sum_{n=0}^k \begin{pmatrix}k \\ n \end{pmatrix} (-1)^{k-n} (2x)^{k-n} u^n = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \sum_{n=0}^k (-1)^{n} \frac{(2k)!}{2^{2k} (k!)^2} u^k \begin{pmatrix}k \\ n \end{pmatrix} (2x)^{k-n} u^n[/tex]

After you switch to the new indices, us will be multiplied by a polynomial with just even or odd powers of x, just like the Legendre polynomials.
 
Though I hadn't given it a lot of thought yet, I expected to have to use the Rodriguez formula. I now see where you are going, though, since I just discovered the expression

[tex] P_k(x) = \frac{1}{2^n} \sum_{n=0}^{[k/2]} (-1)^n \frac{(2k-2n)!}{n!(k-n)!(k-2n)!} x^{k-2n}.[/tex]

So, after using the relation you suggested, I get the sum

[tex] \sum_k \sum_{n=0}^{[k/2]} (-1)^k \frac{(2k-2n)!}{2^{2k-n} (k-n)! n! (k-2n)!} x^n u^{2k-3n}.[/tex]

This is starting to look like what I need, but not quite yet.

As for your second post, I'm not sure what you're doing. First of all, your expression isn't equal to mine, since you have [itex]u^{k+n}[/itex], while I have [itex]u^{2k-n}[/itex]. Is my expression incorrect? Second, what do you mean by 'swap the exponents'?
 
NanakiXIII said:
As for your second post, I'm not sure what you're doing. First of all, your expression isn't equal to mine, since you have [itex]u^{k+n}[/itex], while I have [itex]u^{2k-n}[/itex]. Is my expression incorrect? Second, what do you mean by 'swap the exponents'?
Both expressions are correct. It's just how you applied the binomial theorem. You wrote

[tex](x+y)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n \begin{pmatrix}n \\ k\end{pmatrix} x^k y^{n-k}[/tex]

while I'm suggesting you instead write

[tex](x+y)^n = \sum_{k=0}^n \begin{pmatrix}n \\ k\end{pmatrix} x^{n-k} y^k[/tex]

That's what I meant by "swap the exponents." It's just to make the exponent of u look more like what you're shooting for.
 
Ah, I see what you mean now. I hadn't actually used this form of the binomial expansion, I was using the special case [itex](1+x)^k[/itex] and was factoring out to get that form, so the symmetry got a little lost. Using the second form of the expansion indeed made things a lot neater and I've got my answer now. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K