Generating functions and summation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pere Callahan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Summation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
Pere Callahan
Messages
582
Reaction score
1
Hello this is something that just crossed my mind:

For every real sequence [itex](a_n)_{n\geq 1}[/itex] we can define the generating function
[tex] A(z)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty{a_nz^n}.[/tex]
and this definition suggests that we can compute the sum of the sequence by evaluating A at 1:
[tex] A(1)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty{a_n}[/tex]
provided the sum converges.

This made me wonder if for any sequence of weights [itex](w_n)_{n\geq 1}[/itex] there is a real number x such that we can compute the sum
[tex] \sum_{n=1}^\infty{w_na_n}[/tex]
as A(x).

I haven't spent much time on this, but I would be very interested in any thoughts on the topic.

Thanks,
Pere
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. w_1=1 and w_2=0 shows it's impossible, as [tex]w_n = w_1^n[/tex].