Generating the Borel (sigma-)Algebra

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter matt.qmar
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the sigma-algebra generated by the set F, which consists of all finite unions of sets of the form (a,b], (-∞, b], (-∞,∞), and (a,∞), is equivalent to the Borel algebra on the real numbers. Two key points need to be established: first, that all open sets can be formed from finite unions and intersections of the sets in F, and second, that all sets in F can be derived from finite unions and intersections of open sets. The clarification that countable unions and intersections are necessary for both parts is crucial for proving the properties of the sigma-algebra.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sigma-algebras in measure theory
  • Familiarity with Borel sets and the Borel algebra
  • Knowledge of open and closed sets in real analysis
  • Concept of unions and intersections of sets
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Borel sets in real analysis
  • Learn about the construction of sigma-algebras from generating sets
  • Explore the relationship between open sets and closed sets in topology
  • Investigate examples of generating sigma-algebras in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in measure theory and topology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to understand the foundations of Borel sets and sigma-algebras.

matt.qmar
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi!

We're given a set F, and F is the set of all finite unions of sets of the form (a,b], (-∞, b], (-∞,∞), and (a,∞), for real numbers a & b.

I am trying to show that the sigma-algebra generated by F is actually the Borel algebra on the Reals.

(recalling that the Borel algebra of the reals is the sigma algebra generated by all the open subsets of the real line)

So I think there are two things to show - firstly, that we can generate the Boreal Algebra from these finite unions of sets of the form describe above (F is contained in the Borel algbera)

and secondly, that the Boreal algebra is the "smallest" such algebra,
and by "smallest", we mean that if F is contained in any other sigma algebra, say C, then the Borel Algebra is also conatined in C.

I think once we've shown those things, then we're OK. I'm just not entirely sure on where to start to go about showing them!

Any help much appriciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to show two things:

1) You can form all open sets by forming finite unions/intersections of sets of the form (a,b], (-∞, b], (-∞,∞), and (a,∞).

and conversely,

2) All sets of the form (a,b], (-∞, b], (-∞,∞), and (a,∞) can be formed by forming finite unions/intersections of open sets.
 
Thanks for the reply!

So I can see how to get the open sets from unions and intersections of those sets (Part 1)

But I'm not sure how to get all those sets from finitly many open sets (Part 2)... I can see how to grab the last two, but I'm not sure to form (a,b] and (-∞, b] from open sets; is there a trick by taking unions of (a, b + 1/n) or something along those lines? I know that is a common trick to catch closed endpoints... but I think that only works if we have an infinite union...

Thanks again!
 
matt.qmar said:
Thanks for the reply!

So I can see how to get the open sets from unions and intersections of those sets (Part 1)

But I'm not sure how to get all those sets from finitly many open sets (Part 2)... I can see how to grab the last two, but I'm not sure to form (a,b] and (-∞, b] from open sets; is there a trick by taking unions of (a, b + 1/n) or something along those lines? I know that is a common trick to catch closed endpoints... but I think that only works if we have an infinite union...

Thanks again!

Oh, I'm so sorry. I meant countable unions/intersections in both 1 and 2.
 
Oh, right. Of course! We have a sigma algebra. Thanks again to clarifying exactly what conditions allow that the sigma algebra is generated by a set.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K