Genes that Cause Human Aging: Telomeres, Klotho & Methuselah

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the genetic factors that contribute to human aging, specifically focusing on telomeres, Klotho, and Methuselah, while also considering other potential causes such as cellular damage and errors in cell division.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that telomere shortening is a primary factor in aging, while others suggest that genes like Klotho and Methuselah also play significant roles.
  • One participant introduces the theory that the accumulation of errors during cell division contributes to aging, indicating a broader perspective on the causes of aging.
  • Another participant questions the extent of the impact of DNA damage on cellular function and aging, seeking clarification on the significance of this theory.
  • A later reply attempts to clarify that the accumulation of cellular damage is considered an important cause of aging, though the exact importance remains uncertain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relative importance of various genetic factors in aging, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding which genes are most significant and how they interact with other aging theories.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of aging, the assumptions about the mechanisms involved, and the lack of consensus on the importance of different genetic factors.

pomkon
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What genes cause aging, most people think shortening of telomeres is the main reason of aging, but I know there are more than that, like Klotho, Methuselah. But which fews are more important than others, and what else are there?
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
Don't forget the long standing theory that accumulation of errors in cell division which causes their failure is responsible for much of the aging.
 
You mean that the DNA of the cells have been damaged so mush that it stops dividing, and when a lot of them are dying at the same time, the tissues are losing its phsiological function, and age? BUt why do you say for much of the aging?
 
That's what I meant, yes, sorry if I expressed it awkwardly. With "much of the aging" I meant to say that it's been considered an important cause, although I wouldn't know just how important.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
870
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K