Geodesic Curvature (Curvature of a curve)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of geodesic curvature, particularly its geometric properties and its relationship to metrics in differential geometry. Participants seek references and clarification on the topic, exploring its implications in various contexts, including general relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a need for comprehensive references that develop the geometry of geodesic curvature, noting that existing resources often derive it but do not elaborate further.
  • One participant suggests Do Carmo's "Geometry of Curves and Surfaces" as a rich source for understanding geodesic curvature in 3-space and its relation to curves in Riemannian manifolds.
  • Another participant questions the terminology of "first, second, or third" fundamental forms, indicating a potential misunderstanding or lack of clarity on the topic.
  • A suggestion is made to consult the second volume of Spivak's "A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry" for additional insights on geodesic curvature.
  • One participant clarifies that geodesic curvature relates to the length of the derivative of the tangent vector and indicates its role in determining whether a curve is instantaneously geodesic at a point.
  • Several participants share resources, including a paper on the differential geometry of curves in Minkowski space and a book by Barrett O'Neill, indicating their relevance to the discussion.
  • There is a request for the publication source of a referenced paper, highlighting interest in finding similar works.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions and implications of geodesic curvature, with multiple viewpoints and references being shared without resolution of the underlying questions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express a preference for developing the concept of geodesic curvature in 3-space before generalizing to n-space, indicating a potential limitation in the scope of their current understanding.

Reality_Patrol
Messages
109
Reaction score
1
Can anyone point me to good reference that fully develops the geometry of geodesic curvature? Most of the ones I have manage to derive it, then show it's the normal to the curve, then never mention it again.

I want to know how it relates to the metric, first second or third.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reality_Patrol said:
Can anyone point me to good reference that fully develops the geometry of geodesic curvature? Most of the ones I have manage to derive it, then show it's the normal to the curve, then never mention it again.

I want to know how it relates to the metric, first second or third.

Thanks.

I'm not sure what you mean by "first second or third." But, as I seem to be endlessly saying, I recommend Do Carmo's Geometry of Curves of Surfaces for a very rich discussion of curvature (geodesic curvature in particular) in 3-space and what it means. Much of the topic regarding curves in a general Riemannian manifold is similar in flavor.

As far as I know, the geodesic curvature isn't the normal of the tangent of the curvature, rather it is more or less the length of the derivative of the tangent vector, and it tells you whether the curve is instanteneously geodesic at a particular point or not.
 
I think he means first and second fundamental forms. Is there a third fundamental form?
 
it occurs to me that you might find what you're looking for in the 2nd volume of Spivak's A Comprehensive Introduction of Differential Geometry.

In order to better answer your question, it would help to know what your objective is in studying geodesic curvature (ie what do you want to do with it?) and what resources you've looked up so far.
 
Doodle Bob said:
As far as I know, the geodesic curvature isn't the normal of the tangent of the curvature, rather it is more or less the length of the derivative of the tangent vector, and it tells you whether the curve is instanteneously geodesic at a particular point or not.

That's exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for, but I'd like to see it developed in a more explicit form of course. Thanks for the references, I'm studying GR. But I've found that the geometry is clearer to me if developed in 3-space first then generalized to n-space. Thanks guys.
 
robphy said:
Possibly useful:

On the differential geometry of curves in Minkowski space
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0601002

What publication does this paper come from? It's excellent, and I want to find more like it.
 
Reality_Patrol said:
What publication does this paper come from? It's excellent, and I want to find more like it.

It is indeed very cool. Thanks for pointing it out.
 
Reality_Patrol said:
What publication does this paper come from? It's excellent, and I want to find more like it.

http://arxiv.org hosts e-prints, which may or may not end up in other publications [like journals or books]. To find others like it, I'd start by searching for other articles by the authors on arxiv.org and on the web using http://scholar.google.com/ . Then, I'd search for similar topics and titles.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K