A Geodesic Expansion: Finding the $\theta_{\pm}$ Factor

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter ergospherical
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion Geodesic
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
1,384
1625163149807.png


\begin{align*}
\mathrm{\mathbf{(a)}} \quad U_{\pm} \cdot U_{\pm} &= \dfrac{1}{2} (n_a n^a \pm 2 n_a m^a + m_a m^a) = \pm n_a m^a = 0 \\
U_+ \cdot U_- &= \dfrac{1}{2} (n_a n^a - m_a m^a) = \dfrac{1}{2} (-1-1) = -1 \\ \\

\mathrm{\mathbf{(b)}} \quad P^a_b &= \delta^a_b + U_{\mp}^a (U_{\pm})_b + U_{\pm}^a (U_{\mp})_b \\

&= \delta^a_b + \dfrac{1}{2} (n^a \mp m^a)(n_b \pm m_b) + \dfrac{1}{2} (n^a \pm m^a)(n_b \mp m_b) \\

&= \delta^a_b + n^a n_b - m^a m_b \\

&= h^a_b - m^a m_b \\ \\

\mathrm{\mathbf{(c)}} \quad \theta_{\pm} &= P^{ab} \nabla_a (U_{\pm})_b \\

&= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (h^{ab} - m^a m^b) \nabla_a (n_b \pm m_b) \\

&= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (h^{ab} - m^a m^b) (K_{ab} - n_a n^c \nabla_c n _b) \pm \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (h^{ab} - m^a m^b) (k_{ab} - m_a m^c \nabla_c m _b) \\

&= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (h^{ab} - m^a m^b) K_{ab} - \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \underbrace{h^{ab} n_a}_{= \, 0} n^c \nabla_c n_b + \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} m^b \underbrace{m^a n_a}_{= \, 0} n^c \nabla_c n_b \\

&\hspace{45pt} \pm \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (h^{ab} - m^a m^b) (k_{ab} - m_a m^c \nabla_c m _b) \\ \\

&= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (h^{ab} - m^a m^b) K_{ab} \pm \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (h^{ab} - m^a m^b) (k_{ab} - m_a m^c \nabla_c m _b)
\end{align*}Why is there a factor of ##\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}##, and how do you re-write the second term?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
robphy said:
Is the \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} from the definition of U^a_{\pm}?
Yeah, one thing I don't understand is why the ##\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}## doesn't appear in the equation ##\theta_{\pm} = (h^{ab} - m^a m^b)K_{ab} \pm k## in the question.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top