Geodesics in a rotating coordinate system

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
In a uniformly rotating coordinate system the trajectories of freely moving objects are influenced by an apparent centrifugal and Coriolis force. Is there a coordinate system or metric (or both) in which these trajectories are geodesics instead?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snoopies622 said:
In a uniformly rotating coordinate system the trajectories of freely moving objects are influenced by an apparent centrifugal and Coriolis force. Is there a coordinate system or metric (or both) in which these trajectories are geodesics instead?
The property of being a geodesic doesn't depend on the coordinate system. The trajectories of freely moving objects are always geodesics, whatever coordinate system you use.

In non-rotating Cartesian coordinates [itex]x = vt[/itex] is a geodesic, which in rotating Cartesian coordinates might become [itex]X \cos \omega T + Y \sin \omega T = VT[/itex]. In these coordinates [itex]X = VT[/itex] would not be a geodesic.

I'm not sure if that answers your question.
 
The trajectories of freely moving objects will be geodesics in any coordinate system. The condition for a path being a geodesic is that there are no "real" forces influencing the path. In an inertial frame, there are no real and no apparent forces on a geodesic trajectory. In a non-inertial frame, such as your rotating frame, there may be apparent forces on a geodesic trajectory, but there are still no "real" forces.
 
Hmm.. Thank you both. Must think about this some more.
 
snoopies622 said:
In a uniformly rotating coordinate system the trajectories of freely moving objects are influenced by an apparent centrifugal and Coriolis force. Is there a coordinate system or metric (or both) in which these trajectories are geodesics instead?
I think the metric you are looking for is given in the last paragraph of chapter 2 in this:
http://www.projects.science.uu.nl/igg/dieks/rotation.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator: