Geologic Dating: Accuracy and Methods

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on geologic dating methods used by geologists and paleontologists to date rocks and fossils. Key methods include radiometric dating, stratigraphy, and biostratigraphy, each with varying degrees of accuracy and specific margins of error. Radiometric dating is identified as the most accurate method, while stratigraphy is considered less precise. The conversation also raises questions about the impact of environmental factors, such as a hypothetical water canopy or global flood, on the accuracy of these dating methods.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiometric dating techniques
  • Familiarity with stratigraphy and biostratigraphy
  • Knowledge of geological time scales
  • Basic concepts of sedimentary processes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of radiometric dating, including isotopes and half-lives
  • Explore the methods and applications of stratigraphy in geological studies
  • Investigate the effects of environmental changes on sedimentary layers
  • Learn about the implications of cosmic ray exposure on radiometric dating accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Geologists, paleontologists, environmental scientists, and anyone interested in understanding the accuracy and methods of geologic dating.

Mentat
Messages
3,935
Reaction score
3
No, I'm not talking about courting strategies , I'm talking about the methods by which geologists date rocks and paleontologists date fossils.

First off, I'd like to know what the different methods are.

But, more importantly, I'd like to know how accurate they are...what is the margin of error on each method? Which is the most accurate method? Which is the least accurate?

Any info on this is appreciated.

P.S. if this belongs in some other forum, please move it, it just seemed to fit here.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
I'd like to do something now that I very rarely do. I'm going to combine another thread on this forum (entitled "Water Canopy") with this one, and add the question: What effect would a large Canopy of water have on the dating methods? What effect would a global flood have? Would not the sedimentary strata be "mixed up" a bit? Would not the radiometric dating be a bit confused by the lesser amounts of cosmic rays reaching the surface, due to the Canopy?

Note: These particular questions are not my own. A good friend of mine (creationist, unfortunately) wishes for an answer, but doesn't wish to become a member (yet?).

So, any answers to these questions are doubly appreciated :smile:.
 
Thanks, Ambitwistor! :smile:

Good sites.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K