Geometric Constructible Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter emptyboat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric Numbers
Click For Summary
Geometric constructible numbers are defined by the property that if 'a' is constructible, then the degree of the field extension [Q(a):Q] equals 2^n. However, the inverse is not universally true, as there exist algebraic numbers of order a power of 2 that are not constructible. Participants in the discussion express difficulty in finding clear counterexamples to illustrate this point. The conversation highlights the complexity of identifying such numbers, indicating that it may require extensive contemplation. Ultimately, the quest for a definitive counterexample remains unresolved.
emptyboat
Messages
28
Reaction score
1
Geometric Constructible Numbers...

Hi, everyone.
I have a question about geometric constructible numbers.
I know that "if 'a' is constructible then [Q(a):Q]=2^n."
But I heard that its inverse is not true.
I want some counter examples about the inverse statement.
(I have checked by googling 'i' is a constructible number.)

Help...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


You mean you want a number that is algebraic of order a power of 2 and is NOT a constructible number? Hmm, now thats' a good question! I will need to think about that- for a few decades.
 


Yes, I mean that.
So, there was no clear answer about that?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
802
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K