Geometric progression with exponential function?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving geometric progressions and exponential functions, particularly in the context of calculating a partition function for a particle in a magnetic field. Participants are exploring the relationship between a summation of exponential terms and its representation using hyperbolic functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to express a summation of exponential terms in a form that incorporates hyperbolic functions. There are discussions about rewriting the summation and the potential usefulness of certain identities involving sinh and exponential functions. Some participants express uncertainty about their progress and seek guidance on how to combine terms effectively.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing various approaches and questioning the effectiveness of their methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the rewriting of terms and the use of hyperbolic identities, but there is no explicit consensus on a solution or method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are constrained by forum policies that prevent the sharing of complete solutions, which influences the nature of the guidance provided. There is also mention of the need for clarity in mathematical expressions, indicating that some posts may have been difficult to interpret.

decahal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A particle in magnetic field B with spin S has energy E = -μBm (m=-S,-S+1,...,S). Show that the partition function of a single particle is sinh(βμB(S+1/2))/sinh(βμB/2).
Relevant Equations
Sn= a(1-r^n)/(1-r)
I know that the z for one particle would be e^-βμB(-S) + e^-βμB(-S+1) +...+ e^-βμB(S)
but I have no idea how to equate this to the solution with two sinh in a quotient.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How far can you get? Does <br /> 1 - e^{-x} = e^{-x/2}(e^{x/2} - e^{-x/2}) = 2e^{-x/2} \sinh(x/2) assist?
 
pasmith said:
How far can you get? Does <br /> 1 - e^{-x} = e^{-x/2}(e^{x/2} - e^{-x/2}) = 2e^{-x/2} \sinh(x/2) assist?
I tried to do a geometric progression on the positive and negative separately, this seems like it could potentially help I'm working on it but can you please just give me the full solution.

This only helps to change the denominator on what I have but does not help at combining them much.
I don't think I am on the right track at all, a gentle nudge is just gonna send me free floating in deep space, I need the whole thing.
 
Last edited:
pasmith said:
How far can you get? Does <br /> 1 - e^{-x} = e^{-x/2}(e^{x/2} - e^{-x/2}) = 2e^{-x/2} \sinh(x/2) assist?
unnamed (30).jpg

This is what I have so far and I am not getting any further.
 
Sorry, per pf policy we can't give you the full answer. Maybe you can ask ChatGpt and we can help you correct it if necessary, reverse -engineer it.
 
You quoted the relevant equation $$S_n=a(1+r+r^2+\dots+r^n)=\frac{a(1-r^{n+1})}{1-r}.$$You have the summation $$Z=e^{-Sx}+e^{-(S-1)x}+e^{-(S-2)x}+\dots +e^{Sx}.~~~~(x\equiv \mu\beta).$$What if you rewrote this as $$Z=e^{-Sx}\left(1+e^{x}+e^{2x}+\dots +e^{2Sx}\right)~?$$
 
mentalhealth said:
The partition function for a single particle in a magnetic field is given by:
Your post is quite hard to read. Can you repost it using LaTeX? (There's a handy guide at the bottom left of this thread page.)

Mentor note: The post cited above was deleted for being overly helpful, in violation of forum policies.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
decahal said:
This is what I have so far and I am not getting any further.
While I recommend you try @kuruman's suggestion, you can get your attempt to work. First, you have to fix the sums. The numerators should be ##1-e^{\pm \alpha(S+1)}##. After you fix that, you'll end up with
$$\frac{\sinh \frac{\alpha(S+1)}2}{\sinh \frac \alpha 2} [e^{\alpha(S-1)/2} + e^{-\alpha(S-1)/2}] - 1.$$ Rewrite the sum of exponentials in terms of ##\cosh##, use a product-to-sum hyperbolic trig identity, and then simplify.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K