Proving the Integer Rectangle Property: A Geometric Puzzle

  • Thread starter Thread starter intrepid_nerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric Puzzle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Integer Rectangle Property, which states that if a large rectangle is partitioned into smaller rectangles with integer height or width, then the large rectangle must also possess this property. Participants explored various approaches, including integrating the function exp(2*pi*i*(x+y)) over the rectangle, which reveals that the equation holds true when at least one side of the large rectangle is of integer length. The integration of complex numbers was highlighted as a key technique in understanding this geometric puzzle.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric properties of rectangles
  • Familiarity with complex integration techniques
  • Knowledge of exponential functions in complex analysis
  • Basic principles of mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study complex integration methods, focusing on functions like exp(2*pi*i*(x+y))
  • Research the properties of integer partitions in geometry
  • Explore mathematical proof techniques specific to geometric properties
  • Learn about the implications of integrating complex functions in geometric contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry enthusiasts, and students interested in advanced mathematical proofs and complex analysis will benefit from this discussion.

intrepid_nerd
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Not homework but this is probably the best suited place for a puzzle:

A large rectangle in the plane is partitioned into smaller rectangles, each of which has either integer height or integer width (or both). Prove that the large rectangle also has this property.

I've given this several attempts, starting with adding up the diagonals of each smaller rectangle, I didn't think this was good enough for a definitive proof. I've worked from the larger in towards the smaller ones and the smaller ones out to the larger ones, every time it seems so easily intuitive but the I fail to connect words to it, any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easy way is to integrate e^(i*pi*(x+y))dxdy over the rectangle. Do you see what happens if a side is an integer?
 
Dick said:
The easy way is to integrate e^(i*pi*(x+y))dxdy over the rectangle. Do you see what happens if a side is an integer?

I've never tried integrating imaginary numbers so i can't really follow that function but I'm guessing that the function plots as a non-smooth curve. I've got some reading to do to try and figure this out. Thanks for the new perspective though, I'm intrigued.
 
Last edited:
Actually I flubbed the integrand. Make that exp(2*pi*i*(x+y)). It's not a hard complex integral. Integrate it just like you would integrate exp(a*x). The basic point is that exp(2*i*pi*n)=1 where n is any integer. So exp(2*i*pi*x)-exp(2*i*pi*(x+n))=0.
 
that worked well when set to zero; then only when there was a side of integer length would the equation be satisfied. What beauty!
 
Yeah it is a nice trick. Good to hear you finally got it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K