Geometric Series Derivation for Given Identities

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
opticaltempest
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
I am trying to derive the geometric series for the following given
identities,

[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> \frac{1}{{0.99}} = 1.0101010101... \; \; \; {\rm{ (1)}} \\[/tex][tex] \frac{1}{{0.98}} = 1.0204081632... \; \; \; {\rm{ (2)}} \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

Here is my answer for (1),

[tex] \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\left( {\frac{1}{{100}}} \right)} ^n + 1[/tex]

Here is my answer for (2),

[tex] \sum\limits_{n = 1}^\infty {\left( {\frac{1}{{50}}} \right)} ^n + 1[/tex]

Are my answers correct? The only way I can get the correct answer is by
adding 1 onto the series. Is this the correct way represent the series?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the answers are correct. The reason you are adding 1 onto the series is because this formula for the infinite sum of a geometric series
1/(1-r)
holds when the first term is 1. 1/.99 can be written as 1/(1-.01) so you have ratio r and first term 1, and the sequence you wrote for the first one reflects that only when you add 1 to it. You could sum from 0 to infinity and remove the 1, instead of from 1 to infinity and adding in the 1 afterwards, if you think it looks neater.
 
You can get rid of adding the ones by changing the summation to start from zero instad of one.
 
Ok, I see how changing the lower limit to 0 solves the problem of having
to add 1 to the series.

Thanks!