Geometric series vs. future value computation based on geometric series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the discrepancies between calculating future cash flows using geometric series and the Excel function FV(rate, nper, pmt, (pv)). The user reports different results when using a geometric series sum with parameters a = 0.5, r = 0.5, and n = 10. The response highlights that the Excel FV function may round results to the nearest cent, while manual calculations provide higher precision. Additionally, formatting in Excel could affect the displayed results, leading to confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric series and their summation
  • Familiarity with the Excel FV function and its parameters
  • Basic knowledge of financial calculations and future value concepts
  • Experience with numerical precision and formatting in Excel
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical derivation of geometric series sums
  • Learn how to use the Excel FV function effectively, including its limitations
  • Explore numerical precision issues in financial calculations
  • Investigate how cell formatting in Excel affects displayed values
USEFUL FOR

Students studying finance or mathematics, Excel users performing financial calculations, and anyone seeking to understand the differences between manual and software-based future value computations.

IrinaK.
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello!

Revising geometric series, I have understood that I have the following issue - I have read again about these series and, please, take a look at what I have gotten as a result (picture attached).

If I calculate a future cash flow, that is I take, for example, a = 0,5 (it can be 100, 5 or any other number), r = 0.5 (also can be any other number), n = 10 (same), I get completely different results if I use the sum of geometric series and the future value calculation. Why? In all these cases I compute the sum of a multiplied by r within an n period.

I would be grateful for your help - I obviously miss some basic understanding.

PS: I have tried to paste a picture within this text, the program did not allow that; so I have to upload it.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-11-07 at 12.20.59 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-11-07 at 12.20.59 PM.png
    14.4 KB · Views: 627
Physics news on Phys.org
IrinaK. said:

Homework Statement


Hello!

Revising geometric series, I have understood that I have the following issue - I have read again about these series and, please, take a look at what I have gotten as a result (picture attached).

If I calculate a future cash flow, that is I take, for example, a = 0,5 (it can be 100, 5 or any other number), r = 0.5 (also can be any other number), n = 10 (same), I get completely different results if I use the sum of geometric series and the future value calculation. Why? In all these cases I compute the sum of a multiplied by r within an n period.

I would be grateful for your help - I obviously miss some basic understanding.

PS: I have tried to paste a picture within this text, the program did not allow that; so I have to upload it.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

I normally do not respond to postings containing screen shots (as they are often unreadable), but I will make an exception for you this one and only time. I suspect that the function FV(rate,nper,pmt,(pv) ) is a built-in EXCEL function, that may round off to the nearest cent. (I don't know for sure, having not checked it myself). Your "manual" calculation reports the results to higher precision.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In addition to what Ray said, you could be formatting the cell with $28.83 in it to display two decimal places.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K