Geometrical Optics: Explaining the Effects of Small Wavelengths

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the significance of small wavelengths in geometrical optics, particularly in the context of shadow formation, reflection, and refraction. It highlights that the effectiveness of geometrical optics arises when the wavelength of light is significantly smaller than the dimensions of the reflecting or refracting surfaces. Key concepts such as diffraction and Huygens Principle are essential for understanding how light behaves in relation to these surfaces. The conversation also illustrates the impact of wavelength on beam width in applications like searchlights, demonstrating that longer wavelengths result in wider beams due to phase errors in radiation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of "Diffraction" in wave propagation
  • Familiarity with "Huygens Principle" in optics
  • Knowledge of "Ray optics" derived from wave optics
  • Basic concepts of "Phase errors" in wave mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Diffraction patterns in optics" for practical applications
  • Study "Huygens Principle" in detail to grasp wave behavior
  • Explore "Eikonal approximation" and its implications in optics
  • Investigate "Beamwidth calculations" for different wavelengths in practical scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, optical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of light behavior and its applications in technology.

Anish Joshi
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Read that Ray Optics explains reflection, refraction, formation of shadows, as the wavelength of light is negligible compared to day-to-day objects. Want to understand why Exactly?
Read this in my textbook:-
The reason Geometrical optics works in case of formation of shadows, reflection and rarefaction is that the wavelength of light is much smaller compared to the reflecting/refracting surfaces as well as shadow causing objects that we use in day-to-day life.

I understand how the wavelength is negligible compared to the size of the object. But I want to understand the mechnaism - why and how does the small wavelength matter here?

First question here, so I apologize if there are any mistakes!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: curious_mind
Science news on Phys.org
OK, then you'll want to study "Diffraction" which describes how waves propagate through/past restrictions (like the diameter of a lens). You can also study "Huygens Principle". Also look for videos of diffraction of water waves in a wave tank. That's classically very similar to what light does.

Basically, shadows (or light beams) always have fuzzy edges. If the object is small enough all you get is fuzz. If you have a big object, no one cares about a relatively small amount of fuzziness at the edges.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anish Joshi
Ray optics can be derived from wave optics (i.e., Maxwell's equations) by doing the so-called eikonal approximation (also known as WKB approximation in the context of quantum-mechanical wave mechanics). A good treatment can be found in Sommerfeld, Lectures on Theoretical Physics, vol. 4 (Optics).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: curious_mind and Anish Joshi
Anish Joshi said:
TL;DR Summary:

I understand how the wavelength is negligible compared to the size of the object. But I want to understand the mechnaism - why and how does the small wavelength matter here?
To understand an effect of using a shorter wavelength, consider a parabolic reflector in a 1m diameter searchlight. If we can use a very tiny light source, such as a carbon arc, we can obtain a beam which is almost parallel - it is mainly controlled by the geometry and the ray diagram. But now use the same reflector for microwaves, wavelength say 3 cm. The beam now widens to approx 2 degrees. If we increase the wavelength to 30cm it now becomes 20 degrees. When we move a detector away from the axis of the beam, we lose signal because there is a phase error in the radiation from opposite sides of the reflector. When the wavelength is short, this phase error is greater for a given angle off beam. At the longer wavelengths, the geometry no longer gives a reliable answer for the beamwidth.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Anish Joshi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K