Geometry & Trigenometry problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter someone1029
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a geometry and trigonometry problem involving the cosine rule and the Pythagorean theorem in the context of a right triangle related to a tangent line and a radius of the Earth. Participants are trying to determine the relationship between various lengths and angles, specifically focusing on the length d and the angle lambda.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the use of the cosine rule to find length d but are encountering difficulties in determining the value of lambda. There is a debate about whether the line d is a tangent and how this affects their approach, with some questioning the absence of a right angle in the diagram.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing uncertainty about the geometric relationships in the problem. Some have suggested using the Pythagorean theorem, while others are questioning the assumptions regarding the tangent line and the implications for their calculations. There is no clear consensus on the correct approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not explicitly state that line d is a tangent, and there are concerns about the lack of information regarding the position of the dotted line in relation to the radius. This ambiguity is affecting their ability to formulate a complete equation for d.

someone1029
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question sheet is the attached .jpg file

Homework Equations



No equations as such, however we are doing radian measure at the moment if that helps at all. Angle measurements do not have to be in radians, they can be in degrees.

The Attempt at a Solution



So far we [there are two of us trying to work on this one] have decided to use the cosine rule to find the length d, however we cannot get a value for lambda. Also we think that the dotted line in the second diagram bisects the radius that is parallel to h, we just can't prove it. If we can prove this then we can do the rest of the problem ourselves [we hope].
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 393
Physics news on Phys.org
someone1029 said:

Homework Statement



The question sheet is the attached .jpg file

Homework Equations



No equations as such, however we are doing radian measure at the moment if that helps at all. Angle measurements do not have to be in radians, they can be in degrees.

The Attempt at a Solution



So far we [there are two of us trying to work on this one] have decided to use the cosine rule to find the length d, however we cannot get a value for lambda. Also we think that the dotted line in the second diagram bisects the radius that is parallel to h, we just can't prove it. If we can prove this then we can do the rest of the problem ourselves [we hope].

Why would you use the cosine law? You are TOLD to use the Pythagorean theorem because this is a right triangle- the line of length d, that you are looking for, is tangent to the Earth and so at right angles to a radius of the earth.

The dotted line is perpendicular to the line "r" and "h" but clearly does not bisect the radius. The greater h is the closer that will be to the center of the earth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Where is it stated/indicated that the line d is a tangent?
There is no right angle sign on the diagram indicating this and it isn't stated elsewhere on the sheet.
 
hi I am someone1092's partner in all this
the thing is that we can't figure out how
we can't figure out how 2 use pythagorus, because we couldn't get a full equation for d, even with subsitution and what not. We can get phi=con^-1(h/d), but we can't find an equation involing r. u would think u would use lanbda however the point at which the dotted line passes through the horizontal radius line isn't indicated, hence we can't get a ratio. note that it doesn't go through the radius line at the circumference, but at some unstated ratio.
also if it did go through the line as a tangent, then we would have cos lambda=r/r
so cos lambda=1
therefore lambda would have to equal 0, and we would have an impossible triangle.
this is why we chose to use cosine rule
you end up with d^2=r^2+(r+h)^2-2r(r+h)cos lambda
however, it is stated that we must express d in terms of r and h
hence our delma, we can't find a value for lambda
 
someone1029 said:
Where is it stated/indicated that the line d is a tangent?
There is no right angle sign on the diagram indicating this and it isn't stated elsewhere on the sheet.
If d was not a tangent, then it would either be outside the earth, or it would be possible to move d so the horizon circle increases, but the horizon circle is kind of defined as being the maximum. Think about it, it is kind of obvious actually.
also if it did go through the line as a tangent, then we would have cos lambda=r/r
so cos lambda=1
how did u get that?:confused:
 
someone1029 said:
Where is it stated/indicated that the line d is a tangent?
There is no right angle sign on the diagram indicating this and it isn't stated elsewhere on the sheet.
The problem says that \phi "is the angular separation from the horizon circle". The "horizon circle" is the what you see when your line of sight is tangent to the Earth's surface.

The total of the radius of the earth, r, and the height of the satelite is the length of the hypotenuse of the right triangle. One leg is the distance d and the other is the radius of the Earth r. Put that into the Pythagorean formula.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
901
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K