Isosceles Triangles with Congruent Lateral Sides

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the geometric problem from "Kiselev's Geometry Book I - Planimetry," which asserts that two isosceles triangles with a common vertex and congruent lateral sides cannot fit one inside the other. Participants analyze the implications of the Pythagorean theorem and the properties of angles and sides in isosceles triangles. They conclude that if one triangle's base and height are smaller than the other's, the congruence of the hypotenuses prevents them from fitting inside each other. The argument is reinforced by the theorem stating that the greater angle opposes the greater side.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of isosceles triangles and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Pythagorean theorem
  • Knowledge of basic geometric theorems, including "the greater angle opposes the greater side"
  • Ability to visualize geometric relationships and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of isosceles triangles in depth
  • Learn about the Pythagorean theorem and its applications in triangle geometry
  • Explore geometric proofs involving congruence and similarity of triangles
  • Investigate the implications of angle measures in triangle configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students of geometry, educators teaching triangle properties, and anyone interested in geometric proofs and theorems.

Born
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Problem 99 from "Kiselev's Geometry Book I - Planimetry":

Two isosceles triangles with a common vertex and congruent lateral sides cannot fit one inside the other.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The statement is obviously true. If we visualize each isosceles triangle as made from two right triangles then we see that in order for one to fit in the other both the base and the height of one should be smaller than the bade and height of the other, however this is not possible since the sides of the smaller right triangle would not be able to connect to the endpoints of the hypotenuse by the Pythagorean theorem.

Sadly, the Pythagorean theorem comes later in the book. All I have are some more simple theorems, such as "the greater angle opposes the greater side" and "the greatest slant drawn from a point to a line is the one with the greatest distance from the foot of the perpendicular of the line to the point".

Any help is welcome
 

Attachments

  • Planimetry Problem 99.jpg
    Planimetry Problem 99.jpg
    9 KB · Views: 638
Physics news on Phys.org
So I take i this is a true or false question?

If so, I'm not sure what the question means by "fit inside." If it means one has to be smaller than the other than I think you're right. If "fit inside" means their vertices and sides line up, I think you have an issue with your answer since the triangles are also congruent.
 
I just uploaded a picture to make it clearer.
 
Right. If you decrease the vertex angle but keep the leg length the same, you should be able to use the "greater angle opposes the greater side" property you mentioned to show the new triangle would pop out the bottom of the original.
 
Yes, that makes sense. However, what I want to pove is that if the base and height of a right triangle are inside another then the hypotenuses cannot be congruent. If I can prove that then the isosceles triangles can be argumented to be case of two pairs of juxtaposed right triangles
 
@Born, it sounds like you are still trying to use the logic based on the Pythagorean theorem. You are given the fact that your hypotenuses are congruent. Based on the theorems you listed in post 1, your best argument would be based upon angle measure.
Using the juxtaposed right triangle line of thinking, you should be able to list out the possible cases: 1) increase top angle, 2) decrease top angle -- Since the vertex and lateral sides are congruent, you only have a short argument for both cases to say that neither cases can fit inside the original. Only the congruent triangle would fit on the original.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K