Get the Facts: Get Your Flu Shot Now

  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Last season, 80,000 people died and nearly a million were hospitalized due to the flu in the US, highlighting the importance of vaccination. Despite the effectiveness of flu vaccines in reducing symptom severity and mortality risk, a study revealed that about half of Americans mistakenly believe the vaccines can cause the flu. Vaccination is particularly crucial for vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and those with preexisting health conditions. The discussion also emphasized the societal responsibility of getting vaccinated to prevent the spread of illness. Overall, timely vaccination remains a key preventive measure against flu-related complications.
  • #31
Greg Bernhardt said:
UK has flu rate at 21 per 100k
https://www.theguardian.com/society...gps-under-huge-pressure-as-deaths-soar-to-120

USA has flu rate of 27 per 100k
https://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm

So where are you getting your data?
But this is not representative of the typical flu level over the years. If it were an experiment, the 2017-2018 level you are quoting and matching with the US would be a far outlier for the UK. Is 27 per 100,000, the typical level?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
BWV said:
15k flu deaths in the UK. UK population is roughly 20% of US so within a few percentage points of the same mortality rate.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.te...level-40-years-experts-blame-ineffective/amp/
This is not representative of the flu level in the UK over the years. If, fact in this very article you quote it says its at least double the level of what it should normally be. So is this the typical level in the US or was there an epidemic? Because the UK would then typically have have half or less of the flu related deaths than the US, relative to population size.
 
  • #33
JamesPhD said:
Is 27 per 100,000, the typical level?
You're the one claiming it is not, can you back that up? :smile:
 
  • #34
JamesPhD said:
This is not representative of the flu level in the UK over the years. If, fact in this very article you quote it says its at least double the level of what it should normally be. So is this the typical level in the US or was there an epidemic? Because the UK would then typically have have half or less of the flu related deaths than the US, relative to population size.

The OP referred to US deaths from a bad flu season, not a typical level
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5K ·
183
Replies
5K
Views
296K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 516 ·
18
Replies
516
Views
36K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K