Getting the voltage to drop in a battery?

Click For Summary
To achieve a voltage drop from a 9.0-V battery to 3.5 V using 1.0-Ω resistors, a voltage divider circuit can be constructed with 18 resistors, measuring the voltage across 7 of them. The relationship between the total resistance and the number of resistors is crucial, as the voltage across the selected resistors must equal the desired output. It is noted that the actual resistance values can vary, and configurations other than series can be used to achieve the same result. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding both the voltage divider principle and the need for integer or non-integer resistor values. Ultimately, the solution emphasizes the flexibility in resistor configurations to meet voltage requirements.
mot
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that you have a 9.0-V battery and wish to apply a voltage of only 3.5 V. Given an unlimited supply of 1.0-Ω resistors, how could you connect them to make a “voltage divider” that produces a 3.5-V output for a 9.0-V input
r=resistance of 1 resistor=1
R=Total resistance
v=3.5V

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



Note: The correct answer is use 18 resistors and measure the voltage across 7.
I really have no idea how to do this...
The current has to be the same across one resistor as it is over the entire circuit.
V=IR
I=V/R=v/r
9V/R=v/1Ω=3.5V/(n*1Ω), where n is the number of resistors
I got to a point of 3.5/9 *R=n, and I plugged in their answers and it works, but so does using 36Ω total and 14 resistors. I just don;t know what to do with no current...

I've tried a lot to no avail, so not much of a point of posting it here.

Help please?
Thanks!

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically you also need to know the total resistance of the load - to make sure you deliver 3.5V to the load.
But the question just wants to have an open-circuit voltage of 3.5V - i.e. the volt-drop across some part of the circuit must be 3.5V

You can reason it out:
If you have 1 resistor - the the volt-drop across is it 9V ... too much.
If you used two of them, the volt drop across each one is 4.5V - promising.
Notice that the actual value of the resistors does not matter?

If you used 9 resistors, what is the volt drop across each one?
At this point the solution should present itself.If you prefer to do it algebraically - then consider you have a total of N 1-Ohm resistors in series with voltage V and you want the voltage across n<N of them to have voltage U.

This is the standard voltage divider circuit with two resistors ... one of n-Ohms and the other of (N-n)-Ohms.
U is taken across the n-Ohms resistor, giving relation:

V/U=N/n

Which means that (3.5)N=(9)n which means that 7N=18n which can be written (N/18)=(n/7)

One equation - 2 unknowns: need another equation!
This is where you got up to.

We do know more than that about N and n!
We know that N is minimum and both N and n are integers.
So what is the smallest integer value of N that allows n to be an integer in that relation?
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
So what is the smallest integer value of N that allows n to be an integer in that relation?

Ydon't need integers. It's possible to make resistors of 11/2 and 7/2 ohm with only 12 resistors, or 11/3 and 7/3 with only 11.
 
willem2 said:
Ydon't need integers.
For N and n? (these were defined to be the number of resistors) ... no I suppose you could just saw a resistor in half and seat a new lead! ... you mean I don't need integer resistances ... then: no, this is correct.

It's possible to make resistors of 11/2 and 7/2 ohm with only 12 resistors, or 11/3 and 7/3 with only 11.
There are configurations of resistors other than series - that is correct.
But I did make a mistake though - N does not have to be minimum ;)

It is not what OP was asking about exactly but would make for a more elegant solution than the one provided :)
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K