Getting time domain current from impedance and voltage measurement?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to derive time-domain current measurements from voltage and impedance data in a high power multi-phase DC/DC converter system, particularly focusing on scenarios with fast transient load currents. Participants explore various approaches to convert voltage measurements from the time domain to the frequency domain and back, while considering the limitations of direct current measurement techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests converting time-domain output voltage to frequency-domain and using I = V/Z, but expresses confusion about whether to convolve V with 1/Z.
  • Another participant proposes using a precision resistor in series with the output to measure current indirectly, but this is challenged due to the low voltage and high current conditions.
  • A later reply mentions the impracticality of using a Hall Effect current probe for transient data due to the nature of the load being a BGA chip.
  • Another participant suggests dividing frequency components of voltage by the corresponding impedance values in the frequency domain, emphasizing that this should be done element-wise rather than through convolution.
  • There is a discussion about handling negative frequency components in the FFT results and how to appropriately transform them back to the time domain.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the feasibility of direct current measurement methods and the appropriate mathematical techniques for converting voltage to current. No consensus is reached on a single method, and multiple competing views remain regarding the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations related to the specific characteristics of the power supply and load, as well as the challenges posed by the measurement setup, including the need to account for transient behavior and the nature of the connections involved.

awvvu
Messages
188
Reaction score
1
I'm working on a high power multi-phase DC/DC converter where the load current has some fast transients. We can easily measure the output voltage in the time domain, and also measure the power distribution network impedance in the frequency domain.

So, I think I would try converting the time-domain output voltage to frequency-domain, and then do I = V/Z. Now I'm a little confused, because in the frequency domain, does this mean I should convolve V with 1/Z? After getting the frequency-domain current, then I'll convert this back into time-domain with ifft.

Or can anyone suggest any other methods to measure the current using another method? This is possibly in the 0-100A range going through tons of BGA balls so I don't think I can measure it directly.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
awvvu said:
I'm working on a high power multi-phase DC/DC converter where the load current has some fast transients. We can easily measure the output voltage in the time domain, and also measure the power distribution network impedance in the frequency domain.

So, I think I would try converting the time-domain output voltage to frequency-domain, and then do I = V/Z. Now I'm a little confused, because in the frequency domain, does this mean I should convolve V with 1/Z? After getting the frequency-domain current, then I'll convert this back into time-domain with ifft.

Or can anyone suggest any other methods to measure the current using another method? This is possibly in the 0-100A range going through tons of BGA balls so I don't think I can measure it directly.

I would suggest putting a 0.1 Ohm precision resistor in series with the output of the power supply, and digitizing the differential voltage drop across the resistor along with the input voltage to the resistor. That should give you what you need.
 
Can't do that, the power supply is 1V and the load is almost 100A. The power trace is an entire internal plane to minimize I^2 R loss, so I think the only way to measure the current is indirectly.
 
awvvu said:
Can't do that, the power supply is 1V and the load is almost 100A. The power trace is an entire internal plane to minimize I^2 R loss, so I think the only way to measure the current is indirectly.

Nope. Next choice is using a Hall Effect current probe:

http://www.industrial-toolz.com/?p=439

Can you rent one of those?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, but I can only measure the input current into the switcher, and that's not useful for getting transient data. The actual load is a BGA chip so I can't use a current probe directly.
 
awvvu said:
Yeah, but I can only measure the input current into the switcher, and that's not useful for getting transient data. The actual load is a BGA chip so I can't use a current probe directly.

The switcher feeds the plane with the BGA contacts. There is an output from the switcher. Is it a buck or multiple bucks? Clamp the output inductors...
 
It could be okay to just divide the values of the frequency components of voltage by the value of the impedance at that frequency, and then perform the inverse transform to get current. This should be done element-wise in the frequency domain and not by using convolution.

You may think of the time domain voltage signal source as of as a number of sinusoidal voltage sources in series, with amplitude and phase that may be determined by the DFT of the measured voltage. The theoretical time domain current at the input to the network could be found by superposition, by adding the currents through the load from each of the voltage sources.

There are elements for negative frequencies in the vector that results from the FFT, though.

Perhaps something like this:

1. Divide the elements for zero and positive frequencies by the corresponding impedance at that frequency.
2. In the resulting (transformed current) vector, set the elements for negative frequencies equal to the complex conjurgate of the corresponding positive frequency.
3. Perform the inverse transform.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K