Getting two Answers : calculating velocity of ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter fishspawned
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a ball just before it impacts a box that slides across a surface due to friction. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, specifically energy conservation and momentum, as the original poster explores different approaches to arrive at the ball's velocity.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster presents two attempts to solve the problem: one using energy conservation and the other using force and momentum. They express confusion over the differing results obtained from these methods.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made regarding energy conservation during the collision and the subsequent sliding of the box.
  • There is a discussion about whether all kinetic energy is lost during the sliding stage and if energy is released during the impact.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions, and exploring the implications of energy loss during the impact. There is acknowledgment of the potential correctness of one method over the other, but no consensus is reached on the final outcome.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about energy conservation and the nature of the collision (elastic vs. inelastic) are under discussion, with some participants noting the need for further information to clarify these points.

fishspawned
Messages
66
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement



Mr. Gale decides to build his own velocity measuring machine.
His plan is to build a box (mass 2.50 kg) that catches the ball (mass 0.500 kg) being thrown. It then slides across the desk but eventually comes to a stop due to friction (μ = 0.800) between the box and the surface. He thinks that knowing how far the box slides will allow him to calculate the velocity of the ball just before it hits the box. To test this out he throws the ball and the box slides exactly 38 centimeters. Calculate how fast the ball must have been going just before it hit the box.

The Attempt at a Solution



There were two different ways to approach it. But this gave different answers. One of these is wrong.

ATTEMPT 1 : Using Energy
KE of the ball before just before it hits the box = Work done by friction on the box and ball combined

0.5(0.5kg)v^2 = (0.800)(2.50 + 0.5)(9.8)(0.38)
v = 6.0 m/s

ATTEMPT 2 : Using Force and Momentum
friction is net force, calculate velocity, use momentum to calculate initial velocity in ball

f = (2.50 + 0.5)(9.8)(0.800) = 23.52 = ma
therefore a = (23.52)/(2.50 + 0.5) = 7.84 m/s^2
using v^2 = 2ad
v = sqrt((2)(7.84)(.38)) = 2.44 m/s

therefore pi = pf
(0.5)(v) = (2.44)(2.50 + 0.5)
v = 14.64 m/s

why am I getting different values? There is something I am forgetting here.
Thanks for any help in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is work conserved in the process of catching the ball?
 
i think the assumption i am making is that

KE + Wnc = 0
 
fishspawned said:
i think the assumption i am making is that

KE + Wnc = 0
There are two stages here. In the first stage, the ball is caught by the box, in the second the box slides. You have assumed all initial KE is lost in the sliding stage. Is that a safe assumption?
 
From what you are saying, I am taking it that the impact of the ball on the box would release some energy before it even begins to slide? Could this be calculated? I assume not without further information. However, now this leads me to even more confusion. Are you suggesting that method 2 is correct?
 
fishspawned said:
From what you are saying, I am taking it that the impact of the ball on the box would release some energy before it even begins to slide? Could this be calculated? I assume not without further information. However, now this leads me to even more confusion. Are you suggesting that method 2 is correct?
Method 2 is correct. You can use it to find how much energy was lost in the impact.
Note that for no energy to be lost in the collision it would have to be completely elastic. Newton's "experimental" law tells you that the relative velocity would be negated. That is, the ball and box would move apart just after the collision as fast they approached each other just before the collision.
 
Fantastic. The different velocities is giving me a way to calculate the actual energy loss from the impact. That's awesome. This turned out better than i thought. Many thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K