I posted this earlier, but I just realized it might have been in the wrong section. Sorry(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Okay, so consider you have system in which ΔG<0 and ΔS>0. Using Gibbs free energy (ΔG=ΔH-TΔS), you'll know that it will always be negative. As the temperature increases, it will actually become more and more negative. This means that as the temperature increases to a higher T, ΔG will become even more negative. making the system favor products much more than reactants.

Now consider the equation for the equilibrium constant, Keq=e^-ΔG/TR. Using this definition, as T gets very high, Keq seems to be going to 1, meaning that there will be an equal amount of product and reactants at a very high temperature.

These two definitions are both correct, yet they seem to contradict one another. Why is that? I feel like I'm missing something very definition based.

Thanks in advance to anyone who helps :)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Gibbs free energy and equilibrium constant at a high T

Loading...

Similar Threads - Gibbs free energy | Date |
---|---|

Change in Gibbs free energy at equillibrium | Sep 1, 2016 |

Trouble with Gibbs Free Energy & Equilibrium Constant Calc. | Jun 24, 2016 |

La Chatlier & Gibbs Free Energy Contradiction? | Jun 23, 2016 |

Is Gibbs free energy just potential energy reduction? | Jun 23, 2016 |

Is the minimum Gibbs free energy the same for every material? | May 19, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**